Teams

JByrd-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-25vs APineda-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesCraig Radley vs Matthew Curry6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJonathan Carter vs JOE BERTON6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesBarry Gooch vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-18Won 10
W#1 SinglesSudheer Parvithina vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-11vs EAnderson-DFCWon 21
W#1 SinglesManuel Mariategui Vargas vs Rod Snyder2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNikita Poujai vs Edward Anderson2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMike Meske vs Jason Liss6-0, 6-4
2026-06-04vs APineda-CHTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesMike Meske vs Stephen Stark6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNikita Poujai vs Burak Erdim0-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesCraig Radley vs JOE BERTON6-2, 7-6
2026-06-01vs APineda-CHTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesManuel Mariategui Vargas vs Burak Erdim6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCraig Radley vs Andres Pineda6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMike Meske vs JOE BERTON6-0, 6-1
2026-05-28vs KRamaswamy-DURWon 20
W#1 SinglesCraig Radley vs Kiran Ramaswamy6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMike Meske vs Amit Sachan6-1, 6-4
2026-05-16vs KRamaswamy-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesCraig Radley vs Vamsee Pasangulapati6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNikita Poujai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesManuel Mariategui Vargas vs Balaji Radhakrishnan1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-14vs EAnderson-DFCWon 30
W#1 SinglesCraig Radley vs Edward Anderson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesManuel Mariategui Vargas vs Jason Liss6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMike Meske vs Brandon Garrett6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Jermaine Byrd
published 4.5
3.95
Craig Radley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 17% · published 4
3.90
Mike Meske
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.88
Manuel Mariategui Vargas
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.86
Sudheer Parvithina
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.77
Jonathan Carter
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.75
Barry Gooch
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.64
Nikita Poujai
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.60
Olimani Deivasigamani
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · no lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Craig Radley
13W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Mike Meske
28W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Manuel Mariategui Vargas
22W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Sudheer Parvithina
35W–38L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.86
Jonathan Carter
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Barry Gooch
112W–110L career · 1 line in 2026
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Nikita Poujai
122W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Olimani Deivasigamani
162W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.