Teams

Tarpon Net Ninjas

2025 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 M Saturday

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-17vs RCSP FantauzzoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRobert B Buckner / Declan Mansfield vs Kevin Fantauzzo / Steven Friedman7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesJose H Salazar vs Brian Mannari6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMatthew Johns / John Weissler III vs Mony Rodon / Alan Chin2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDon Porter / Chris Ruskowski vs Franklin Boyd / Roger Blair2-6, 2-6
2025-04-19vs SPTC Holliday 3.5MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDon Porter / John Weissler III vs Edgar Rodriguez / Daniel McKinney2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChris Ruskowski vs Gerard Grady6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatthew Johns / Robert B Buckner vs John Stone / Michael Donovan7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClinton Sheets / Bernardo Perez de Lara vs Christopher Zibailo / Wayne Lemmerbrock6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-12vs Ardea InsanaWon 21
L#1 DoublesDeclan Mansfield / John Borrelli vs Jeff Sourini / Robert Burns2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesClinton Sheets / Matthew Johns vs Philip Noll / Patrick LaLone7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesChris Ruskowski / John Weissler III vs Dan McMullen / Gregg Stallwood7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-05vs Feather Sound DikmenLost 12
W#1 DoublesJose H Salazar / Bernardo Perez de Lara vs David Dikmen / Mark Higgins6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMatthew Johns / Chris Ruskowski vs Simon Gregorich / Randy Kane6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRobert B Buckner / Don Porter vs Ray Baker / Dean Bartles2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Jose H Salazar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.27
Declan Mansfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Don Porter
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
John Weissler III
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Matthew Johns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Chris Ruskowski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Robert B Buckner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Clinton Sheets
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jose H Salazar
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Declan Mansfield
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Don Porter
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
John Weissler III
9W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Matthew Johns
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Chris Ruskowski
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Robert B Buckner
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Clinton Sheets
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.