Teams

STC ZAVASKY

2026 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-17vs RID EVANSSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanice Wolf / Debbie Greenwood vs Sara Slesinger / Molly Davidson7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJudy Zavasky / Janet Helsel vs Hannah Boyd / Amanda Tonroy7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2026-04-10vs CCC ROSSWon 40
W#1 DoublesDebbie Greenwood / Janice Wolf vs Lisa Podell / Linda Paul6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNikki Smith / Vanessa Ramos vs Lisa Yager / Sherri Ross6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTiffany Larza vs Kelly Pumphrey6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTracye Kenney / Elizabeth Wayland vs Melinda Bonnell / Molly Keathley6-0, 6-3
2026-04-03vs CCP ASAAD***Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Greenwood / Tiffany Larza vs Noreen Kane / Danielle Andrus6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Zavasky / Erin Myers vs Brooke Keller / Veronica Krall2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVanessa Ramos / Elizabeth Wayland vs Tricia Hamell / Keirstin Vaccaro3-6, 2-6
2026-04-02vs SOAKS BOYDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJudy Zavasky / Debbie Greenwood vs Lori Clark / Gracie Santana6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTiffany Larza / Alison Morris vs Debbie Abraham / Sonjia Fields6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesErin Myers / Janice Wolf vs Vona Wawryszczuk / Cheryl Kruckemeyer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-03-13vs RTC CATESWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie Greenwood / Judy Zavasky vs Sherrie Panter / Kimberly Blakey6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTiffany Larza / Elizabeth Wayland vs Jennifer Lucas / Kim Thompson7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTracye Kenney / Vanessa Ramos vs Kim Adamcik / Ruby Hudnall6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-06vs RC RAVNAASLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebbie Greenwood / Peggy Booth vs Casey Lebus / Keelie Montague1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJudy Zavasky / Alison Morris vs Ashley Watson / Lindsey Baird4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesVanessa Ramos / Tiffany Larza vs Ally Ravnaas / Madi Boenker6-1, 6-1
2026-02-27vs WAG RAMEYWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie Greenwood / Judy Zavasky vs Mandy Rhodes / Jackie Parades7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTiffany Larza vs Ann Cicardo7-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJulie Schafer / Erin Myers vs Erin Gaudet / Ashley Hickey6-4, 7-5
2026-02-20vs ATC SOLISWon 21
W#1 DoublesJudy Zavasky / Tiffany Larza vs Michele Solis / Jeanette Johnson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlison Morris / Julie Schafer vs Georgie Zang / Julia Holden5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanice Wolf / Janet Helsel vs Ginger Justice / Lisa Woody5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Tiffany Larza
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.38
Judy Zavasky
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.35
Debbie Greenwood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Anita Owen-Myers
published 3.5
3.23
Julie Schafer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Vanessa Ramos
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.20
Chelsea Klinke
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.19
Peggy Booth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Elizabeth Wayland
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.17
Janice Wolf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Tracye Kenney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Janet Helsel
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Melissa Jolly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Greenwood + Judy Zavasky11258% games+5.1% vs expected
Tiffany Larza + Elizabeth Wayland8357% games−2.7% vs expected
Judy Zavasky + Tiffany Larza404 matchesnot enough data
Janet Helsel + Anita Owen-Myers123 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Greenwood + Janice Wolf123 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Greenwood + Tiffany Larza123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Larza
26W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Judy Zavasky
29W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Debbie Greenwood
27W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Anita Owen-Myers
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Julie Schafer
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Vanessa Ramos
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Chelsea Klinke
12W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Peggy Booth
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
9%89%1%
3.19
Elizabeth Wayland
16W–14L career · 10 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Janice Wolf
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Tracye Kenney
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Janet Helsel
15W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.02
Melissa Jolly
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.