Teams

EW-WRAC-Kromholtz

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-29vs CBRC -So Easy!Won 30
W#1 DoublesBrad Bartol / Patricia Houghton vs Larry Floyd / Lynne Roeder6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichael Bendtsen / Victoria van Zile vs Adam Hrebeniuk / Rise Hawley6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Kromholtz / Pamela Kromholtz vs Nikolla Qafoku / Xia Suter6-2, 6-1
2025-06-28vs YTC - Divorce CourtWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrad Bartol / Patricia Houghton vs Wally Morrison / Susan Morrison7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Bendtsen / Victoria van Zile vs Richard Lozano / Dawn Degrasse2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKevin Kromholtz / Pamela Kromholtz vs James Degrasse / TERESA FOSSUM6-1, 6-1
2025-06-28vs CBRC -So Easy!Won 21
W#1 DoublesBrad Bartol / Patricia Houghton vs Lynne Roeder / Pane Stankovic6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Bendtsen / Victoria van Zile vs Adam Hrebeniuk / Signe White6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKevin Kromholtz / Pamela Kromholtz vs Nikolla Qafoku / Rise Hawley6-3, 6-4
2025-06-27vs YTC - Divorce CourtWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrad Bartol / Patricia Houghton vs Richard Lozano / Dawn Degrasse6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Bendtsen / Victoria van Zile vs Wally Morrison / Susan Morrison7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Kromholtz / Karen Wasylyshyn vs James Degrasse / TERESA FOSSUM6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brad Bartol
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Patricia Houghton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Victoria van Zile
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Elizabeth Nott
published
Karen Wasylyshyn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kevin Kromholtz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Michael Bendtsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Kromholtz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Samuel Nott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Bendtsen + Victoria van Zile224 matchesnot enough data
Brad Bartol + Patricia Houghton404 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Kromholtz + Pamela Kromholtz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brad Bartol
39W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Patricia Houghton
67W–53L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Victoria van Zile
75W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Nott
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Wasylyshyn
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Kromholtz
13W–1L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Bendtsen
67W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Kromholtz
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuel Nott
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.