Teams

SFV - Triple Trouble

2022 Mixed Tri-Level 18+ SFV · SFV Tri-Level Mixed 3.0-4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-13vs SFV - Love HandlesWon 10
W#1 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Sara Heum vs Sylvia Yaafe / Dan Lula5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Larissa Kazantsev vs Kathy Devore / Anish Vashistha7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-10-30vs SFV - Get A GripWon 20
W#1 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Sara Heum vs John Rubeli / Stacy Rubeli6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNazar Makadsi / Larissa Kazantsev vs Deborah Kerr-Orlik / Randy Orlik6-2, 6-4
2022-10-23vs SFV LLW - Nice Aces - Lee TsaiLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathrina Cruz / Edmond Avedisian vs Stefanie Wah / Jared Mano3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-09-25vs SFV - Pure DriveWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Lubnow / Kathrina Cruz vs Marcos Sevilla / Marcy Marder6-1, 7-6
2022-09-17vs SFV - Tri Purple WarriorsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Lubnow / Larissa Kazantsev vs Carlos Yguico / Nichole Carlin7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Tri-Level Mixed 3.0-4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Summer Williamson
published
3.82
Sara Heum
published 4
3.72
Teri Gustafson
published 4
3.65
Kathrina Cruz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Edmond Avedisian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Deepak Antony
published 4
3.40
David Lubnow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Ola Heum
published
Holly Culhane
published 3.5
2.83
Larissa Kazantsev
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.66
Molly Jackson
published
Nazar Makadsi
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Summer Williamson
49W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Sara Heum
122W–70L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Teri Gustafson
84W–67L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Kathrina Cruz
221W–229L career · 6 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Edmond Avedisian
104W–117L career · 4 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Deepak Antony
4W–16L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
David Lubnow
73W–69L career · 2 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
Ola Heum
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.39
3.5
Holly Culhane
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Larissa Kazantsev
74W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Nazar Makadsi
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.