Teams

Majestic - Mixed 55s 7.0

2022 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs Cole - Mixed 55s 7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Gay / Robert Gay vs Elizabeth Deterding / Craig Aberbach6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndy Kirsteins / Marian Hogan vs Keith Pearson / Marsha Tice6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesKimberly Gay / Robert Gay vs Kelly Smith / Karrie Manson6-3, 6-2
2022-06-27vs Berreth - Mixed 55s 7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesMark Heinbach / Marian Hogan vs Kathryn Michaud / Bernie Besterci6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesScott Majestic / Diane Majestic vs Tammie Hughes / Neal Hughes6-1, 6-2
2022-06-20vs Wilkinson - Mixed 55s 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesScott Majestic / Kimberly Gay vs Betty Haggard / John Archambault6-1, 6-1
2022-06-13vs Hilliard - Mixed 55s 7.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesMark Heinbach / Diane Majestic vs Steve A'Della / Shelby Rhyne6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKimberly Gay / Robert Gay vs Garland Hilliard / Sally Bason6-2, 6-3
2022-06-06vs Cole - Mixed 55s 7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesScott Majestic / Diane Majestic vs Teddy Eng / Lynn Tester6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKimberly Gay / Robert Gay vs Marsha Tice / Keith Pearson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesScott Sharer / Marian Hogan vs Nancy McNeill / Robert Dunbar6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-30Won 10
W#1 DoublesScott Majestic / Diane Majestic vs Joey Harding / Natalie Wallace6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Diane Majestic
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.61
Marian Hogan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Scott Majestic
published
3.57
Kimberly Gay
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.30
Andy Kirsteins
published 3.5
3.26
Trisha Kirby
published
3.25
Cal Kimrey
published 3.5
3.13
Jeff Kirby
published
Kelly Pryzwansky
published
Mark Heinbach
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Majestic
204W–63L career · 7 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Marian Hogan
128W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%21%79%
3.61
Scott Majestic
20W–18L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Kimberly Gay
376W–167L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
Andy Kirsteins
14W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Trisha Kirby
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Cal Kimrey
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Jeff Kirby
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Kelly Pryzwansky
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Heinbach
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.