Teams

LHMA-MacFayden/Jetton

2025 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 6.5 Women 18s

14 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesKristy Del Monte / Monaliza Onia vs Amy Marin / Lindsay Marin6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTiffani Japec / Cindy Japec vs Bonnie Little / Sherry Carpenter6-2, 6-1
2025-10-01vs LSPE-Pensler-Nardone/NMPLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Anne Emlong / Heather MacFadyen vs Jaime Cooper / Amy Dunn4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNorma Zitnik / Sheila Hebert vs Darlene Scripter / Victoria Ciucci1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Nyquist / Monaliza Onia vs Leah Rand / Leslie Shaw6-0, 6-0
2025-09-24vs LLBA-Bartolucci/RRWon 30
W#1 DoublesCindy Japec / Tiffani Japec vs Jessica Ryan / Natalie Brescian6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Nyquist / Natalie Reid vs Kate Straiter / Jenny Brewton6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShana Erber / Laurie Watson vs Colleen Penhall / Tara Hauk6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-17vs LCGR-Griffin/Jetton 6.5 18+Won 21
L#1 DoublesKristy Del Monte / Monaliza Onia vs Bonnie Zentner / Monica Fish4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Anne Emlong / Heather MacFadyen vs Nicole Monacell / Hope McAfee7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Japec / Tiffani Japec vs Danielle Mikolajczyk / Sayra Brynn6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-10vs LMRO-Robinson/WestportSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeather MacFadyen / Heidi Nyquist vs Rebecca Karner / Katie Pendergast7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTiffani Japec / Serena Igharas vs KJ Gibson / Astrid Peterson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-03vs LKAD-Adams-Wright/JettonWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeidi Nyquist / Heather MacFadyen vs Jamie Chapman / Nancy Bessler6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Japec / Tiffani Japec vs Gina van Nortwick / Christine Marcavish6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSheila Hebert / Shana Erber vs Claudia Burdulis / Shannon Armstrong6-2, 7-5
2025-08-27vs LLHE-Herrmann/JettonWon 20
W#1 DoublesErin MacAulay / Monaliza Onia vs Sylvia Sullivan / Liz Cloninger6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSerena Igharas / Sheila Hebert vs Lawren Wells / Emily Spillman2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLori Anne Emlong / Heather MacFadyen vs Kimberly Benz / Jeannie Cassarino6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCindy Japec / Tiffani Japec vs Nicole Francomano / Sarah Goddard6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kristy Del Monte
published 3.5
3.44
Cindy Japec
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.41
Lori Anne Emlong
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.39
Erin MacAulay
published
3.32
Serena Igharas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Laurie Watson
published 3
3.21
Heidi Nyquist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Norma Zitnik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Heather MacFadyen
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Shana Erber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Sheila Hebert
published
3.03
Monaliza Onia
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.01
Tiffani Japec
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.95
Natalie Reid
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Nyquist + Heather MacFadyen171254% games+8.1% vs expected
Cindy Japec + Tiffani Japec7654% games+7.3% vs expected
Heidi Nyquist + Cindy Japec9554% games+2.9% vs expected
Norma Zitnik + Heather MacFadyen7649% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Nyquist + Norma Zitnik3642% gamesnot enough data
Serena Igharas + Heather MacFadyen4455% gamesnot enough data
Lori Anne Emlong + Heather MacFadyen5253% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Nyquist + Serena Igharas2351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristy Del Monte
40W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Cindy Japec
240W–219L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Lori Anne Emlong
131W–83L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Erin MacAulay
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Serena Igharas
149W–124L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3
Laurie Watson
39W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.24
3.5
Heidi Nyquist
129W–151L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Norma Zitnik
131W–136L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Heather MacFadyen
118W–128L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Shana Erber
32W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Sheila Hebert
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Monaliza Onia
63W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
3
Tiffani Japec
50W–39L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Natalie Reid
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.