Teams

2 Wyndham Warriors - Houff

2024 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-07vs 7 Westwood - RabhanLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrian Zollinhofer vs Thomas Leftwich6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrad Houff vs Shailesh Khatri6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-04vs 5 Burkwood - SinsabaughSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBrad Houff vs Jason Butler1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesBrian Zollinhofer vs Chris Gillam6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-10-24Lost 01
L#3 SinglesBrad Houff vs Andy Tucker1-6, 3-6
2024-10-17vs 14 Byrd Park - NedeffLost 01
L#2 SinglesBrad Houff vs Geoffrey Giraud1-6, 0-6
2024-10-10vs 4 Powhatan 4.0 Tennisbums - KelleyLost 01
L#3 SinglesBrad Houff vs Owen Alberti2-6, 0-6
2024-10-08vs 1 ACAC HollomonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBrad Houff vs Brian Holahan1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesBrian Zollinhofer vs Doug Okay6-2, 6-3
2024-10-03vs 13 Bon Air MorrisLost 03
L#1 SinglesBrian Zollinhofer vs Matthew Morris6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBhargavaram Kallam vs Heath Flohre1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesBrad Houff vs Colin Atkinson4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-09-24vs 10 The Westwood BoysLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrian Zollinhofer vs Bailey Mountcastle2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesBhargavaram Kallam vs Kevin Whitlock0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Brian Zollinhofer
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.00
Lee Brooks
published
3.75
Bhargavaram Kallam
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.59
Brad Houff
usually #3 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.24
Bert Foreman
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Houff + Brian Zollinhofer12560% gamesnot enough data
Brad Houff + Bhargavaram Kallam6358% gamesnot enough data
Brian Zollinhofer + Bhargavaram Kallam6166% gamesnot enough data
Lee Brooks + Bhargavaram Kallam303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Zollinhofer
211W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Lee Brooks
28W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Bhargavaram Kallam
146W–87L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Brad Houff
114W–106L career · 7 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Bert Foreman
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.