Teams

LCTA18/Tyner/Maybank

USTA 18 & Over Adult Mixed Doubles · 7.0

18 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-05-16vs LCTA18/Britton/MaybankWon 10
W#1 DoublesLance Tyner / Amy Henderson vs Constance Campbell / Donzell Bailey6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-09vs LCTA18M/Beck/CTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesLance Tyner / Michelle Crivella vs Matthew Whipple / Maggie Voelkel6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Nicholas Connolly
published
4.16
Blair Jennings
published 4.5
4.02
John Gottshalk
published
3.92
Chris Wigginton
published 4
3.81
Allyson Priddy
published 4
Amy Henderson
published 4
3.68
Celia Shore
published 4
3.54
Tammy Trenholm
published
3.46
Bobby Meadows
published 3.5
3.44
Michelle Crivella
published
3.33
Sam Wilburn
published
3.31
Bonnie Jennings
published 3.5
3.26
Kristin Whalen
published
3.24
Lance Tyner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Lindsay Eddy
published
3.21
Amber McQueen
published 3.5
3.13
Tracey Zirneklis
published
3.08
Michael Sweet
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allyson Priddy + Chris Wigginton8555% games−5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicholas Connolly
37W–18L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Blair Jennings
73W–45L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
4.16
John Gottshalk
77W–49L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Chris Wigginton
124W–66L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%27%
3.92
4
Allyson Priddy
48W–31L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Amy Henderson
38W–28L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Celia Shore
47W–29L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Tammy Trenholm
68W–44L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Bobby Meadows
59W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Michelle Crivella
85W–59L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Sam Wilburn
31W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Bonnie Jennings
61W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
Kristin Whalen
43W–53L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Lance Tyner
283W–198L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Lindsay Eddy
58W–48L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Amber McQueen
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Tracey Zirneklis
49W–52L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
Michael Sweet
79W–46L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.