Teams

Long/Nashville - Open Registration

2026 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Men - Saturday Daytime

11 players · average NTRP 2.93 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-04-04vs Alessi/Pershad/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesAlexander Tripp / Kevin Garrett vs Andrew Stankiewicz / Alexandre Hirlinger1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBrendan Cooney vs Philippe Bronchtein6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlex LaCava / Alex Pope vs Jack Ramthun / Luke Mock1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Depew / Blake Rowlinson vs Joseph Wrubel / Mateo Arana0-6, 0-6
2026-03-28vs Cooke/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Pope / Joshua Opdahl vs Donald Hollowell / Campbell Luschen2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBrendan Cooney vs Sherwin Farhoudi6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesBrian Depew vs Chad Arnold4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men - Saturday Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
David Long
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
John Tyler Burden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alex Pope
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Brendan Cooney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Kevin Garrett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Brian Depew
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Alex LaCava
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Alexander Tripp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Blake Rowlinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Joshua Opdahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Long
11W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
John Tyler Burden
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Alex Pope
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Brendan Cooney
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kevin Garrett
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Brian Depew
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Alex LaCava
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Alexander Tripp
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Daniel Valencia Samame
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Blake Rowlinson
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joshua Opdahl
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.