Teams

SDNC LLW 4.0 Scripps Ranch/ Nguyen

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WE · SDNC - Men - 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-02vs SDNC 4.0 RBS&T(2:2)/ RamsayerWon 10
W#2 DoublesBruce Nguyen / Ray Fisher vs Mark Logan / Rick Sauer6-4, 6-4
2025-02-16vs SDNC 4.0 BTP (2:2)/ QuintalWon 10
W#2 DoublesBruce Nguyen / Ray Fisher vs Evan Green / Michael Russo6-4, 6-2
2025-02-09vs SDNC 4.0 Fairbanks(3:1)/ GehrkeWon 20
W#1 DoublesRay Fisher / Mark Schmitt vs Joel Bonnema / Juancho Eekhout6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Kimble / Man Wong vs Todd Bulich / Scott Miller6-1, 6-3
2025-02-08vs SDNC 4.0 SDTC(3:1)/ UrcelayLost 01
L#1 DoublesMan Wong / Steve Kimble vs Michael Urcelay / Haytham Allos0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-02vs SDNC 4.0 La Costa(3:1)/ FlahertyLost 01
L#1 DoublesBruce Nguyen / Ray Fisher vs Joseph Pasquito / Donald Carroll0-6, 0-6
2025-01-19vs SDNC 4.0 RDO(3:1)/ TiltonLost 01
L#1 DoublesBruce Nguyen / Ray Fisher vs Christopher Berg / Benjamin Braitsch6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-12vs SDNC 4.0 Fairbanks(3:1)/ LoewSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMark Motluck / Steve Kimble vs Adam Loew / Vitor Roque6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBruce Nguyen / Ray Fisher vs Robert Brownhill / Rodrigo Serzedello2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Ray Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Mark Schmitt
published
3.77
Bruce Nguyen
published 4
Derek Gallup
published 4
3.68
Steve Kimble
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Mark Motluck
published
Shitiz Arora
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Nguyen + Mark Schmitt4161% games+4.6% vs expected
Ray Fisher + Steve Kimble213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ray Fisher
51W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Mark Schmitt
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Bruce Nguyen
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Derek Gallup
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Steve Kimble
133W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Mark Motluck
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shitiz Arora
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.