Teams

Heavy Hitters

Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 5.00 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-12vs Merion CricketWon 21
W#1 DoublesRushi Amin / Chris Choo vs David Blumeris / Leonardo Barbosa7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMichael Litz vs Brandon Caban1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRogelio Gonzalez / Graham Lehman vs Townsend Morris / Peter Vale6-2, 6-4
2026-08-12vs Red FoxesWon 30
W#1 DoublesRushi Amin / Eric Ripkin vs Jacob Dornsife / Karlyn Small6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTyler Barr vs Danila Kourkoulin6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRogelio Gonzalez / Andrew Friedman vs Andrew Pace / Rico Pagnanelli6-2, 6-3
2026-08-02vs Red FoxesLost 12
L#1 DoublesRogelio Gonzalez / Graham Lehman vs Daniel Dudockin / Karlyn Small3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesChris Choo vs John Graff0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesHector Irizarry / William Metz vs Stephen Le / Rico Pagnanelli3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-28vs First State AcesLost 12
W#1 DoublesTyler Barr / Eric Spangler vs Juan Araoz / Brady Burns6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAndrew Guzick vs Kamala Kannan4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRushi Amin / Andrew Friedman vs Eric Biscoveanu / Scott Battaglia4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-28vs Upper DublinWon 30
W#1 DoublesTyler Barr / Rogelio Gonzalez vs Spencer Clark / Jack Peterson7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEric Spangler vs Benjamin Adey6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRushi Amin / Graham Lehman vs Tyler Blessing / Adam Townsend6-2, 6-2
2026-06-28vs Merion CricketWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Litz / Chris Choo vs Gregg Frigerio / David Blumeris1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEric Spangler vs Peter Vale6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTyler Barr / William Metz vs Paul Mirabello / Leonardo Barbosa4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-14vs Upper DublinLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Ripkin / Michael Litz vs Tyler Blessing / Peter Leese4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTyler Barr vs Benjamin Adey6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Friedman / Chris Choo vs Jeremy Loomis / Olivier Stuart1-6, 6-7
2026-06-07vs First State AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Litz / Rushi Amin vs Robert Wirth / Kamala Kannan6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTyler Barr vs Brady Burns6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1First State Aces0816818192
2Heavy Hitters0815920198
3Merion Cricket0891533234
4Red Foxes0891533255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.00
Eric Spangler
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.89
Tyler Barr
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.87
Rogelio Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.82
Rushi Amin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Andrew Friedman
published 5
Andrew Guzick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.68
Eric Ripkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.63
Graham Lehman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.61
Michael Litz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.39
Chris Choo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
4.27
Victor Espinoza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
William Metz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Hector Irizarry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Metz + Victor Espinoza134 matchesnot enough data
Rushi Amin + Michael Litz224 matchesnot enough data
Michael Litz + Eric Ripkin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Spangler
21W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
5.00
Tyler Barr
26W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.89
Rogelio Gonzalez
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.87
Rushi Amin
30W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Andrew Friedman
7W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
5
Andrew Guzick
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Eric Ripkin
14W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Graham Lehman
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.63
Michael Litz
17W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.61
5
Chris Choo
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.39
Victor Espinoza
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
William Metz
34W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Hector Irizarry
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.