Teams

Drop Shots

2023 40&Over Women · Winter

16 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-26Won 10
W#1 DoublesYolanda Barron / Lisa Baird vs Karen Lerner / Susan Roos6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-03-05Split 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Baird / Heidi Block vs Juanita Tam / Cathleen Lopez2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMaria Yaroshenko vs Karen Lerner2-6, 5-4, 1-0
2023-02-26vs Rally CatsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Baird / Yolanda Barron vs Louise Arkel / Rachel Lightman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMaria Yaroshenko vs Julia Markensohn7-5, 5-4
2023-01-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Baird / Charlene Lee vs Cathleen Lopez / Juanita Tam2-6, 0-6
2023-01-22vs Rally CatsWon 10
W#3 DoublesDebbie Brown / Rocio Aliaga Yermack vs Ana Laura Gonzalez-Quijano / Christine Rafizadeh6-3, 7-5
2023-01-08vs Plainfield PlayersWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Baird / Yolanda Barron vs Joanna Tricorache / Noel Olsen6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMaria Yaroshenko vs Deborah Rogut6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRocio Aliaga Yermack / Denise Thompson vs Daryl Caiola / Christina Maurillo3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Winter
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Plainfield Players08171534290
2GK Honey Deuces09152150343
3Coradini/Lipton0963061376
4GREEN MEANS GO010301025268
5GK Titans010251539330
6Drop Shots010192149340

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Deborah Marcus
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.39
Diana Glendinning
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Chabi Mathur
published 3.5
Denise Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3.5
3.21
Heidi Block
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.20
Maria Yaroshenko
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.16
Yolanda Barron
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #1 Singles 8% · published
3.09
Jodi Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Marta Kuttner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Debbie Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.91
Denise Moser
published 3
Charlene Lee
published
Lisa Baird
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Patricia Miller
published
Pilar Cazorla Arratia
usually #1 Singles 92%, also #2 Doubles 8% · published
Rocio Aliaga Yermack
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marta Kuttner + Debbie Brown5258% games+9.7% vs expected
Marta Kuttner + Heidi Block6257% games+7.8% vs expected
Jodi Friedman + Heidi Block141054% games+1.3% vs expected
Yolanda Barron + Diana Glendinning3450% games−2.9% vs expected
Debbie Brown + Heidi Block2546% games−6.9% vs expected
Denise Moser + Jodi Friedman0728% games−22.7% vs expected
Denise Moser + Denise Thompson224 matchesnot enough data
Rocio Aliaga Yermack + Debbie Brown404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Marcus
79W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Diana Glendinning
29W–17L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Chabi Mathur
4W–0L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Denise Thompson
3W–10L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Heidi Block
30W–26L career · 10 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Maria Yaroshenko
24W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Yolanda Barron
57W–43L career · 12 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Jodi Friedman
22W–27L career · 8 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Marta Kuttner
96W–54L career · 6 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
3.5
Debbie Brown
54W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.96
3
Denise Moser
60W–72L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
Charlene Lee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Baird
19W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Miller
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pilar Cazorla Arratia
18W–34L career · 13 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rocio Aliaga Yermack
40W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.