Teams

Apex:Eberhardt

2025 ME Fall Tri Level · Women 3.5

3 players · average NTRP / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-06vs Apex:DoyleWon 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Johnson / Regina Morton vs Diana Doyle / Julie Sargent7-5, 6-0
2025-12-06vs Apex:LimitedAvailability:LambertWon 10
W#1 DoublesRegina Morton / Regina Yoon vs Gwen Lambert / Shelley Goodrich7-5, 6-1
2025-11-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesWendy Johnson / Regina Morton vs Carol Kelley / Kathy Brown6-2, 6-3
2025-11-16vs Apex:TheVolleyLLamas:CannonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Eberhardt / Wendy Johnson vs Lynn Berardelli / Wendy Cannon6-3, 6-2
2025-10-18vs Apex:LimitedAvailability:LambertWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Eberhardt / Regina Yoon vs Gwen Lambert / Morgan Cohen4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-18vs Apex:DoyleWon 10
W#1 DoublesRegina Morton / Regina Yoon vs Rachael Haded / Diana Doyle6-3, 6-2
2025-10-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Eberhardt / Wendy Johnson vs Carol Kelley / Kathy Brown6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Apex:TheVolleyLLamas:CannonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Eberhardt / Regina Morton vs Dana DeFilippo / Leslie Nogic6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Apex:Eberhardt8080253
2Apex:MissHits:Brown5353872
3Apex:LimitedAvailability:Lambert35351182
4Apex:TheVolleyLLamas:Cannon26261283
5Apex:Doyle26261387

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Karen Eberhardt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Regina Morton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Regina Yoon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Eberhardt + Regina Yoon6155% games+6.3% vs expected
Regina Morton + Regina Yoon8556% games+6.2% vs expected
Regina Morton + Karen Eberhardt17956% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Eberhardt
190W–107L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Regina Morton
202W–141L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Regina Yoon
133W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.