Teams

DO 7.5W 55 & Over (Shields)

2025 Dothan USTA Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-09vs WTC- Wade 55 & Over 7.5 ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesMartha Collins / Michele Andrews vs Amy Pruitt / Julia Johnson6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Byrd / Elizabeth Odom vs Millie Armstrong / Carie Crowley6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBeverly Shields / Leigh Cooper vs Veleta Watson / Karan Barber6-2, 6-4
2025-09-02vs WTC- Wade 55 & Over 7.5 ComboWon 20
W#1 DoublesBeverly Shields / Leigh Cooper vs Julia Johnson / Cindy Watt6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMartha Collins / Michele Andrews vs Veleta Watson / Karan Barber6-4, 6-1
2025-08-26vs WTC- Wade 55 & Over 7.5 ComboWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Whittle / Leigh Cooper vs Millie Armstrong / Lydia Camacho6-4, 6-1
2025-08-19vs WTC- Wade 55 & Over 7.5 ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Whittle / Deanna Jimison vs Millie Armstrong / Carie Crowley6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Martha Collins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Jennifer Whittle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Beverly Shields
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Michelle Gusmus
published
3.55
Melissa Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Leigh Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Lisa Howard
published
3.30
Elizabeth Odom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Deanna Jimison
published 3.5
Marilyn Pittman
published
Michele Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Gusmus + Lisa Howard123 matchesnot enough data
Michele Andrews + Martha Collins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Collins
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Jennifer Whittle
53W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Beverly Shields
9W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Michelle Gusmus
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Melissa Byrd
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Leigh Cooper
38W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Lisa Howard
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.32
Elizabeth Odom
176W–100L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Deanna Jimison
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marilyn Pittman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Andrews
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.