Teams

HMTC RED

2023 ITA MIXED - NOCO · MIXED 8.5 - ITA - NOCO

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-14vs CSU GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelley Hoime / Clayton McLaughlin vs Jesse Chavez / Christine Pelletier2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStu Hoime / Suzanne Hale vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-13vs LVTA NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesMitzi Johnson / Stu Hoime vs Taylor Nguyen / Macy Ricketts5-7, 4-6
2023-08-06vs LVTA NAVYLost 01
L#3 DoublesMatt Badger / Carmen Kilday vs Jacob Krause / Leslie Jamison2-6, 2-6
2023-07-23vs CSU GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarmen Kilday / Aaron Phillips vs Austin Stege / Bridget Murdock4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesClayton McLaughlin / Kelley Hoime vs Jesse Chavez / Annette Vizena6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Hale / Stu Hoime vs Brady Bower / Christine Pelletier5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-16vs LVTA NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesAaron Phillips / Suzanne Hale vs Taylor Nguyen / Erin Hauser-Roe6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-09vs CSU GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarmen Kilday / Aaron Phillips vs Dylan Hatanelas / Amanda Repert7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.5 - ITA - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Andrew Meister
published 4.5
4.28
Michael Dirvonas
published
4.21
Clayton McLaughlin
published 4.5
4.21
Suzanne Hale
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Carmen Kilday
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.95
Mitzi Johnson
published
3.88
Matt Badger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Aaron Phillips
published 4
3.75
Kimberly Tomlinson
published
3.58
Kelley Hoime
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Stu Hoime
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
LeAnne Collins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Hoime + Stu Hoime51241% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Meister
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
4.38
Michael Dirvonas
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Clayton McLaughlin
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Suzanne Hale
133W–73L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Carmen Kilday
79W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.20
Mitzi Johnson
19W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
4
Matt Badger
55W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Aaron Phillips
33W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.81
Kimberly Tomlinson
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
96%4%<1%
3.75
4
Kelley Hoime
46W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Stu Hoime
42W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.54
LeAnne Collins
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.