Teams

CSRC GAYDOS

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-28vs MEMPK GOLDSTEINWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Carpenter / Craig Gaydos vs Jeff Kulich / John Tompkins3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike Guinn / Nate Hopkins vs Jonathan YATES / Todd Goldstein6-1, 6-4
2024-05-21vs CCW MCCLELLANDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCraig Gaydos / Jeff Carpenter vs Tom Jackson / Harsha Nagaraj2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMike Guinn / Nate Hopkins vs Matthew Johnson / William Tostanoski6-0, 6-3
2024-05-14vs LTFCS DARKWon 10
W#2 DoublesCraig Gaydos / Jeff Carpenter vs Trent Glaser / Cederick Dark6-2, 6-4
2024-05-07vs MEMPK GOLDSTEINWon 10
W#1 DoublesMike Guinn / Nate Hopkins vs Pelham Sean / Jeff Kulich6-2, 6-3
2024-04-30vs CCW MCCLELLANDWon 20
W#1 DoublesCraig Gaydos / Jeff Carpenter vs Lance McClelland / Troy Kittelson7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike Guinn / Nate Hopkins vs Bruce Bugno / Michael Cook7-6, 6-1
2024-04-23vs LTFCS DARKWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Carpenter / Craig Gaydos vs Brett Matheson / Neal Siegel6-2, 6-2
2024-04-16vs MEMPK GOLDSTEINSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Carpenter / Craig Gaydos vs Todd Goldstein / Jeff Kulich6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMike Guinn / Nate Hopkins vs Pelham Sean / John Tompkins4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Ryan Hill
published
3.66
Mike Guinn
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.58
Richard Boyle
published
3.44
Nate Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Jeff Carpenter
published
3.30
Mark Phelan
published
Charlie Cuthill
published 3.5
3.21
Craig Gaydos
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.10
Gene Bloch
published
Marcos Velasco
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nate Hopkins + Mike Guinn15364% games+7.1% vs expected
Jeff Carpenter + Craig Gaydos6751% games−1.0% vs expected
Mark Phelan + Charlie Cuthill5349% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Hill
35W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Mike Guinn
84W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Richard Boyle
23W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
3.5
Nate Hopkins
66W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Jeff Carpenter
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Mark Phelan
26W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Charlie Cuthill
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Craig Gaydos
95W–74L career · 6 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Gene Bloch
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Marcos Velasco
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.