Teams

SD 3.5 UCRC (3:2 11AM)/ Chin

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WE · SD - Men - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesArjay Mendoza / Tyler Van Stone vs Robert Boyhan / Hosam Kamel6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmir Naghshineh-Pour vs Timothy Owen6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKeith Chin / Christopher Lock vs Abe Davalos / Nathan Beutler6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRyan Rigney vs Mike Yaldo0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChris Anthes / Bhargava Sana vs Tony Almanza / David Schumann6-3, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Amir Naghshineh-Pour
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Arjay Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Melvin Pascoguin
published
3.23
Bhargava Sana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Keith Chin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Christopher Lock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Tyler Van Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Chris Anthes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ryan Rigney
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Sia ZANDIEH
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bhargava Sana + Keith Chin3252% games+4.9% vs expected
Keith Chin + Tyler Van Stone3251% games+1.0% vs expected
Bhargava Sana + Melvin Pascoguin224 matchesnot enough data
Arjay Mendoza + Amir Naghshineh-Pour303 matchesnot enough data
Chris Anthes + Keith Chin033 matchesnot enough data
Amir Naghshineh-Pour + Melvin Pascoguin123 matchesnot enough data
Keith Chin + Christopher Lock213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amir Naghshineh-Pour
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Arjay Mendoza
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Melvin Pascoguin
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Bhargava Sana
12W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Keith Chin
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Christopher Lock
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Tyler Van Stone
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Chris Anthes
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Ryan Rigney
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sia ZANDIEH
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.