Teams

Calkins 40 4.5M Singles Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 40+ · 4.5 Men Singles Thurs

6 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs Davis 40 4.5M Singles Thurs PMLost 03
L#1 SinglesMark Lapierre vs Michael Xu2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesNeal Dorman vs Adam Kerr1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesCharles Calkins vs Michael Davis1-6, 2-6
2025-07-08Won 20
W#1 SinglesMark Lapierre vs Chris Chapman4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesCharles Calkins vs Brad Johnson6-3, 6-2
2025-06-19vs Davis 40 4.5M Singles Thurs PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesNeal Dorman vs Michael Xu2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCharles Calkins vs Adam Kerr3-6, 1-6
2025-06-18vs Chapman 40 4.5M Singles Thurs PMLost 12
W#1 SinglesBryan Vescio vs Charlie Lambis6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesNeal Dorman vs Lee Picklesimer2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesZiad Fleihan vs James Kash3-6, 5-7
2025-06-12vs Rutledge 40 4.5M Singles Thurs PMWon 10
W#3 SinglesCharles Calkins vs Amiel Rossabi6-3, 6-2
2025-06-03vs Davis 40 4.5M Singles Thurs PMWon 10
W#1 SinglesBrian Johnson vs Adam Kerr1-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men Singles Thurs have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Bryan Vescio
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Ziad Fleihan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
4.06
Brian Johnson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.69
Charles Calkins
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
Mark Lapierre
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Neal Dorman
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bryan Vescio
37W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Ziad Fleihan
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Brian Johnson
127W–77L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Charles Calkins
13W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Mark Lapierre
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Neal Dorman
1W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.