Teams

Team Morris

2023 Coppermine Tri-Level 18 & Over · Coppermine Tri Level Women 3.5,3.0,2.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-13vs Team ScottWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne Schaefer / Emily Trochimowicz vs Dianna Sinofsky / Michelle Tyde6-1, 6-0
2023-10-08vs Team ScottWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Trochimowicz / Roshni Fifadra vs Heather Nesti / Claire Taylor6-0, 6-4
2023-09-16vs Team ScottSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarole Veihmeyer / Emily Trochimowicz vs Aimee MacEda / Claire Taylor6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Betsy Morris vs Kate Matterer / Leigh Tobin4-6, 3-6
2023-09-10vs Team NelsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Trochimowicz / Anamara Jones vs Heather Chilcot / Nicole Lubin3-6, 3-6
2023-08-31vs Team ScottLost 02
L#2 DoublesCheryl Royce / Seema Iyer vs Heather Nesti / Jennifer Exelby0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Long / Emily Trochimowicz vs Elena Lee / Beth van Derslice4-6, 4-6
2023-08-28vs Team FlahertyLost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Royce / Emily Trochimowicz vs Steffie Cannella Beck / Julie Pistorio6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-08-21vs Team NelsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Cheryl Royce vs Cecilia-Hien Phan / Julie Pistorio7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Coppermine Tri Level Women 3.5,3.0,2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Roshni Fifadra
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Cheryl Royce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Emily Trochimowicz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Anne Schaefer
published 3
2.55
Seema Iyer
published
2.54
Linda Harrell
published
2.53
Gail Lawson
published 3
2.31
Betsy Morris
published 2.5
2.18
Stephanie Baker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seema Iyer + Stephanie Baker033 matchesnot enough data
Emily Trochimowicz + Roshni Fifadra123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Roshni Fifadra
129W–127L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.25
3
Cheryl Royce
122W–139L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Emily Trochimowicz
105W–115L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Anne Schaefer
20W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Seema Iyer
3W–16L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.55
Linda Harrell
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Gail Lawson
2W–14L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
2.53
2.5
Betsy Morris
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.31
Stephanie Baker
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.