Teams

Mitchell/IND

2026 Adult 18 & Over Women - DAY LEAGUE NON-ADVANCING · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-01vs Pigo/BentonvilleLost 01
L#1 SinglesAllison Hobbs vs Sydney Flaig0-6, 0-6
2026-04-23vs Pigo/BentonvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllison Hobbs / Taryn Shannon vs Jill Marley / Marcy Martinovic0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Martin / Liz Lewis vs Tracie Larson / Rachael Deboard0-6, 0-6
2026-04-23vs Fitzpatrick/Rogers/INDLost 01
L#1 DoublesTaryn Shannon / Jenna Woodard vs Sofie Coleman / Alida Fitzpatrick0-6, 0-6
2026-04-10vs Stroup/Bentonville/MPLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Mitchell / Heather Wardle vs Sarah Murders / Jessica Kcam Cubas1-6, 0-6
2026-04-09vs Stroup/Bentonville/MPLost 01
L#2 DoublesJenna Woodard / Liz Lewis vs Haily Jones / Petra Dawson1-6, 0-6
2026-03-31vs Brunner/BentonvilleLost 02
L#1 SinglesAllison Hobbs vs Natalie Houstman0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJenna Woodard / Heather Wardle vs Laura Huitsing / Ellen Masters0-6, 0-6
2026-02-26vs Brunner/BentonvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesAllison Hobbs / Liz Lewis vs Sandy Brunner / Natalie Houstman0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.85 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.01
Jenna Woodard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.90
Allison Hobbs
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.80
Liz Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.70
Heather Wardle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Woodard
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.01
2.5
Allison Hobbs
0W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Liz Lewis
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%0%
1.80
Heather Wardle
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.