Teams

River Strand Barnard

2021 Sarasota Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-02-27vs Payne Park PanthersWon 20
W#1 DoublesKim Reiser / Judi Wilson vs Elizabeth Russell / Christina DeCarlo6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Sylvia Sethares-Heyl vs Betsy Winder / Beatrice Uzielli7-6, 6-2
2021-02-15vs Longwood Wilson-SnyderWon 31
L#1 DoublesTeri Barnard / Kara Beene vs Sheri Hart / Kimberly Johnston4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKim Reiser vs Abigail Stephens2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros vs Ann Davy / Anna Bacher Brown6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Finman / Judi Wilson vs Yvonne Ghilardi / Dorene Seider6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2021-01-30vs Sarasota - SSC/SolomonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKim Reiser / Judi Wilson vs Alejandra Sanderson / Christina Dorothy2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLorraine Breidenstein vs Cristina Tomadin3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Finman / Bernadette King vs Heidi Grimes / Lori Campbell2-6, 2-6
2021-01-23vs Jacaranda Double TroubleLost 04
L#1 DoublesKara Beene / Teri Barnard vs SueAnn Sanders / Annthonia Prossi7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKim Reiser vs Hao Li Ee3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSharyn Quiros / Hattie Grimsley vs Constance Duncan / Marsha Timm6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Finman / Lorraine Breidenstein vs Kanjana Thomas / Suyuan Mason6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-01-16vs GT Bray Babes Who HustleWon 31
L#1 DoublesHattie Grimsley / Sharyn Quiros vs Malika Apple / Judith Lubbers3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKim Reiser vs Marcia Frost6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNancy Finman / Judi Wilson vs Lu Circelli / Elsa Trefil6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLorraine Breidenstein / Bernadette King vs Barbara Mire / Rhonda Sutton6-3, 6-3
2021-01-09vs Laurel Oak CarpenterWon 40
W#1 DoublesKara Beene / Teri Barnard vs Susan Rakay / Tanya Keith6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJudi Wilson / Lorraine Breidenstein vs Keely Crosby / Courtney Rosenthal6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNancy Finman vs Jennifer Stroble7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBernadette King / Sylvia Sethares-Heyl vs Roxy Mollod / Teri Sayre4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Teri Barnard
published
3.92
Kim Reiser
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.91
Kara Beene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Nancy Finman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Bernadette King
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Judi Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
Hattie Grimsley
published 4
3.46
Sharyn Quiros
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Colleen Kendle
published 3.5
2.95
Lorraine Breidenstein
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Reiser + Nancy Finman7457% games+13.2% vs expected
Lorraine Breidenstein + Judi Wilson131152% games+9.2% vs expected
Judi Wilson + Sharyn Quiros232151% games+6.6% vs expected
Kim Reiser + Kara Beene4552% games+4.5% vs expected
Kim Reiser + Judi Wilson16853% games+1.2% vs expected
Kara Beene + Nancy Finman705552% games−2.4% vs expected
Bernadette King + Judi Wilson101149% games−6.4% vs expected
Lorraine Breidenstein + Nancy Finman2845% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teri Barnard
46W–21L career · no lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Kim Reiser
105W–66L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Kara Beene
240W–153L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Nancy Finman
138W–95L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Bernadette King
50W–58L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Judi Wilson
135W–101L career · 5 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Hattie Grimsley
4W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Sharyn Quiros
96W–91L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Colleen Kendle
9W–18L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.29
Sylvia Sethares-Heyl
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.95
Lorraine Breidenstein
101W–147L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.