Teams

ZWester (Piper Glen)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Mon PM

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-10vs STyagi (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKunal Verma / Joseph Garner vs Saurabh Tyagi / Amit Srivastava0-6, 1-6
2022-09-19vs TJones (Jeff Adams) (CCT)Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris Nee / Joseph Garner vs Ornob Roy / Todd Mason7-5, 6-4
2022-08-24vs TJones (Jeff Adams) (CCT)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTim Hodgkins / Joseph Garner vs Ornob Roy / Sean OLeary6-4, 6-4
2022-08-08vs MTwer (Weddington)Won 10
W#2 DoublesChris Nee / Joseph Garner vs Bruce Gibson / Vladislav Valtsis3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
David Shevsky
published 3.5
3.40
Eric Weinbrenner
published 3.5
3.34
Jeremy Rhoten
published 3.5
2.93
Joseph Garner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.92
Kristoff Goson
published
2.67
Kris Chapman
published
Jason Colgate
published
Rob Eby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Weinbrenner + David Shevsky5058% games+3.7% vs expected
David Shevsky + Joseph Garner3251% games−4.0% vs expected
Jeremy Rhoten + David Shevsky2353% gamesnot enough data
Jeremy Rhoten + Eric Weinbrenner303 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Rhoten + Joseph Garner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Shevsky
118W–37L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
3.65
3.5
Eric Weinbrenner
28W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Jeremy Rhoten
48W–55L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3
Joseph Garner
48W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
Kristoff Goson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Kris Chapman
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Jason Colgate
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rob Eby
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.