Teams

Nicholson

2022 Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-06-28vs GladdenWon 10
W#2 DoublesJD Zachry / Kushal Patel vs Key Sar / Jim Tacka6-2, 6-2
2022-06-25vs ThomassonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJD Zachry / Kushal Patel vs Greg Critcher / Matthew Kennedy6-3, 6-3
2022-06-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesJD Zachry / Kushal Patel vs Jay McGinnis-Tingle / Brandt Butcher6-1, 4-0
2022-06-21vs GladdenWon 10
W#2 DoublesKushal Patel / JD Zachry vs Steve Newcomer / Daniel Mandl5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-14vs ThomassonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJD Zachry / Kushal Patel vs Jay McGinnis-Tingle / Matthew Kennedy6-1, 6-0
2022-06-06vs GladdenWon 10
W#1 DoublesJD Zachry / Zachary Patterson vs Richard Albers / Tom Lusby6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-04vs GladdenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJustin Wagner / JD Zachry vs Tom Lusby / Maulik Joshi6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJoshua Sadler vs Jared Penoyar0-6, 1-6
2022-05-24vs ThomassonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJD Zachry / Kushal Patel vs Walter Winston / Jay McGinnis-Tingle6-3, 6-3
2022-05-21Won 10
W#1 SinglesJD Zachry vs Brian Kuhn6-1, 6-0
2022-05-17vs GladdenWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephen Wolff / JD Zachry vs Steve Newcomer / Rondall Payton6-4, 6-3
2022-04-27vs ThomassonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJD Zachry / Kushal Patel vs Greg Critcher / Christopher Gowen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-02vs GladdenLost 02
L#1 DoublesERIC KEITZ / JD Zachry vs Tom Lusby / Greg Leihy2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Appel / Joshua Sadler vs Jim Tacka / Richard Albers1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
JD Zachry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Justin Wagner
published
3.73
Shane Degreenia
published
3.72
Dan Drennan
published 4
3.61
Brian Kovalski
published 4
3.50
Joshua Sadler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Kushal Patel
published
3.25
James Appel
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Wagner + JD Zachry303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
JD Zachry
84W–48L career · 12 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Justin Wagner
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Shane Degreenia
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Dan Drennan
4W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Brian Kovalski
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Joshua Sadler
126W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
Kushal Patel
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
James Appel
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.