Teams

Chapman - SHL

2022 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-07-18vs Marino - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 SinglesVan Hughes vs Amelia Gandy4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Cupp / Amy Harrison vs Dawn Marino / Tracey Mcclurd6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-06vs McCarthy - RS ClayLost 03
L#1 DoublesLee Ann Pugh / Van Hughes vs Renee Bradford / Ashle Tran1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Harrison vs Jennifer Passeretti5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesEdith Brodie / Jackie Barclay vs Arlene Doyle / Whitney Sumrall2-6, 2-6
2022-06-15vs McCarthy - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Harrison / Donna Madison vs Jennifer Passeretti / Tami McGhee4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJackie Barclay / Lee Ann Pugh vs Arlene Doyle / Renee Bradford6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2022-06-08vs Marino - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesDonna Madison / Amy Harrison vs Carly Russell / Jena Wise3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVan Hughes vs Tracey Mcclurd3-6, 3-6
2022-05-25vs McCarthy - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesDonna Madison / Lee Ann Pugh vs Tami McGhee / Shellie McCall2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVan Hughes / Wanda Chapman vs Renee Bradford / Whitney Sumrall0-6, 4-6
2022-05-18vs Marino - RS ClaySplit 11
L#1 DoublesLee Ann Pugh / Amy Harrison vs Elizabeth Elliott / KIMBERLY ANDREWS0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDonna Madison / Van Hughes vs Emily Hillman / Selma Dudley Horne6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Edith Brodie
published 4
3.52
Jackie Barclay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Amy Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.45
Donna Madison
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.37
Heather Doerr
published 3.5
3.36
Van Hughes
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Lee Ann Pugh
published
3.33
Anna Kreis
published 3.5
3.20
Wanda Chapman
published
Kris Pritchard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Madison + Amy Harrison4643% gamesnot enough data
Donna Madison + Van Hughes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edith Brodie
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jackie Barclay
2W–19L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Amy Harrison
53W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Donna Madison
58W–72L career · 4 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Heather Doerr
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Van Hughes
84W–84L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Lee Ann Pugh
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Anna Kreis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Wanda Chapman
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
3.20
Kris Pritchard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.