Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 18AW3.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Elizabeth Carey
published
3.39
Marilena Gallotta
published
3.36
Jeanne Hoffman
published
3.27
Su-Mien Chong
published
3.21
Becky Packard
published 3.5
3.15
Karen Davison
published
3.14
Monica Reid
published
3.07
Goldie Cheng
published
2.99
Tammy Nurisso
published
2.91
Teresa Tan-Vial
published
2.76
Virginia Halsey
published
2.71
Susan Philip
published
2.65
Ann Cleveland
published 3
2.53
Noreen Connor
published
Sandra Ricci
published
Sandy Shepherd
published
Wenonah Devens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Halsey + Susan Philip123 matchesnot enough data
Teresa Tan-Vial + Becky Packard033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Carey
11W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
Marilena Gallotta
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
Jeanne Hoffman
10W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
Su-Mien Chong
11W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Becky Packard
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Karen Davison
34W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%14%86%
3.15
Monica Reid
3W–18L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.14
Goldie Cheng
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
Tammy Nurisso
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
2.99
Teresa Tan-Vial
10W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.91
Virginia Halsey
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
Susan Philip
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Ann Cleveland
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
2.65
Noreen Connor
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
2.53
Sandra Ricci
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandy Shepherd
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wenonah Devens
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.