Teams

Chase - Keswick

2025 Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over · Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-30vs DeSouza - Acac ace kickersLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Zeller / Katherine Morris vs Dulcy Giuliano / Stacy Moren2-6, 4-6
2025-07-24vs DeSouza - Acac ace kickersLost 01
L#1 SinglesMelissa Zeller vs Tammy Hertel1-6, 1-6
2025-07-15vs DeSouza - Acac ace kickersWon 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Glass / Mary Voelmle vs Susan Bayliss / Linda Dumansky6-1, 6-0
2025-07-14vs DeSouza - Acac ace kickersLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusie Chung / Mary Voelmle vs Lindsay Bazydlo / Catherine DeSouza2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMelissa Zeller vs CAROLYN WARD0-6, 0-6
2025-06-26vs DeSouza - Acac ace kickersLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelissa Zeller / Katherine Morris vs Susan Bayliss / Lauren Riddick5-7, 4-6
2025-06-12Won 10
W#1 SinglesMary Voelmle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Lauren Suggs
published
3.78
Susie Chung
published
3.71
3.64
Mary Voelmle
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Kristin Carter
published
3.57
Kimberly Glass
published
3.49
Maggie Moore
published
3.36
Katherine Morris
published
3.26
Nancy Ferguson
published
3.10
Melissa Zeller
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Randi Rievman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Suggs + Maggie Moore314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Suggs + Kimberly Glass213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Suggs
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.06
Susie Chung
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Elizabeth Ratcliffe
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Farrell Vangelopoulos
10W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Mary Voelmle
148W–99L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Kristin Carter
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.63
Kimberly Glass
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
Maggie Moore
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Katherine Morris
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.36
Nancy Ferguson
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.26
3.5
Melissa Zeller
121W–104L career · 10 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
Randi Rievman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.