Teams

Cheval Aces and Sevens - N. Martinez

2021 Hillsborough Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-30vs Hunters Green Machine - E. HajekWon 20
W#1 DoublesEsteban Carrascal / Lorrie White vs Alecia Collins / Eddie Collins6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarija Seovic / Kalicharan Durgampudi vs Tibbie Farnsworth / Matthew Warren2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-16vs Buckhorn Smoking AcesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDavis Bilardello / Dara Bilardello vs Chris Chee-A-Tow / Gina Morgan4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Hayes / Lorrie White vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-05-02Won 10
W#2 DoublesDara Bilardello / Davis Bilardello vs Natalia Loutas / Michale Winn6-4, 7-5
2021-04-25vs HCC Spoilers - M. PalmerLost 02
L#1 DoublesLorrie White / Adam Crane vs Jeffrey Biezunski / Yenny Velez2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDavis Bilardello / Dara Bilardello vs Chris Sorensen / Kristen Shinners7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2021-04-18vs Tampa Palms No Names - M. AdamsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Crane / Lorrie White vs John Cotey / Matura Suksai7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Angie Jones
published 4.5
4.06
Davis Bilardello
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.79
Adam Crane
published 4
3.68
Natalie Martinez
published
3.64
Matthew Hayes
published
3.41
Dara Bilardello
published 3.5
3.38
Terry Wilson
published
3.35
3.31
Marija Seovic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Luke Gatza
published
3.15
Lorrie White
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Melissa Chevalier
published
2.81
Angela Huber
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Davis Bilardello + Dara Bilardello3352% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Jones
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
4.37
4.5
Davis Bilardello
68W–40L career · 3 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
4.06
4
Adam Crane
12W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
Natalie Martinez
24W–23L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
Matthew Hayes
17W–23L career · no lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Dara Bilardello
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
Terry Wilson
10W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
Kalicharan Durgampudi
12W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Marija Seovic
99W–72L career · 1 line in 2021
1%92%8%
3.31
Luke Gatza
8W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lorrie White
184W–124L career · 4 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
Melissa Chevalier
13W–11L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Angela Huber
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.