Teams

WARD-CCC

2026 Combo 18 & Over-DLT · Women 6.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 6:00 PM
Cleveland Country Club
Sep 21 6:00 PM
vs
Cleveland Country Club
Sep 30 6:00 PM
vs
Twin Rivers Recreation Association
Oct 4 2:00 PM
Cleveland Country Club
Oct 7 6:00 PM
Greenville Country Club
2026-08-30vs Joel CCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTaylor Ward / Kathryn Boykin vs Kaley Joel / Samantha Myers6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBlair Campbell Taylor / Lauren Shurden vs Maghan Ashmore / Teresa Reed4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-08-25vs Hamrick - BearPenWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaribeth Crews / Stephanie Farris vs Caroline Hill / Tracy Etheridge3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTaylor Ward / Kathryn Boykin vs Holly Wells / Callie Gordon7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelsey Spradling / Blair Campbell Taylor vs Susan Adams / Lauren Brocato7-6, 6-3
2026-08-16vs Powers GCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesBlair Campbell Taylor / Kelsey Spradling vs Lizzie Powers / Kimberly Gnemi6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesStephanie Farris / Brittany Bowen vs Claire Smith / Lindsay Powers2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKelli Williams / Taylor Ward vs Sloane Fair / Nancy Johnson6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WARD-CCC1021222
2Deloach-Greenville CC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Blair Campbell Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Callie Rose Rocconi
published 3.5
2.84
Sarah Howard
published
2.78
Taylor Ward
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Lauren Shurden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Stephanie Farris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Maribeth Crews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Kelsey Spradling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Kathryn Boykin
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.43
Brittany Bowen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taylor Ward + Kelsey Spradling7853% games−3.1% vs expected
Kathryn Boykin + Blair Campbell Taylor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blair Campbell Taylor
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Callie Rose Rocconi
14W–13L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
Sarah Howard
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
Taylor Ward
25W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.78
Lauren Shurden
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%11%89%
2.67
Stephanie Farris
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.66
Maribeth Crews
19W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%13%87%
2.66
Kelsey Spradling
24W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60
Kathryn Boykin
15W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%32%68%
2.57
3
Brittany Bowen
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.