Teams

LTFC RED

2021 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-07-11vs CPV BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesKC Agrelius / Yvette Watson vs Mark Rousseau / Katie Abner7-5, 6-2
2021-07-07vs SH GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesTim Root / Danielle Martines vs Kirklyn Simonton / Nick Hinton5-7, 4-6
2021-06-27vs CACI REDLost 02
L#2 DoublesKC Agrelius / Yvette Watson vs Julio Casillas / Julie Clapham2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMike Mooney / Cathie Frazzini vs Thomas Samuelson / Kristi Samuelson2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-18vs HRCA BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesCathie Frazzini / Tim Root vs Rebecca Duque / David Kannikal6-2, 6-1
2021-05-30vs SSLT BLUELost 02
L#2 DoublesGreg Brooks / Cathie Frazzini vs Marcela Rascon / Richard Best2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Martines / Mike Mooney vs Tanya Taylor / Andy Rinehart5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
KC Agrelius
published 4.5
4.02
Travis Beard
published
3.76
Greg Brooks
published 4
3.76
Yvette Watson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Danielle Martines
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Cathie Frazzini
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Nancy Brooks
published
3.25
Lisa Robertson
published
Kelly Root
published
Laura Ray
published
Mike Mooney
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Tim Root
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Brooks + Greg Brooks91348% games−5.1% vs expected
KC Agrelius + Cathie Frazzini044 matchesnot enough data
Travis Beard + Laura Ray314 matchesnot enough data
Travis Beard + Cathie Frazzini213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
KC Agrelius
33W–47L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
Travis Beard
65W–40L career · no lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
4.02
4
Greg Brooks
50W–35L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Yvette Watson
74W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Danielle Martines
66W–56L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Cathie Frazzini
80W–87L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
Nancy Brooks
44W–87L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.58
Lisa Robertson
26W–19L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Kelly Root
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Ray
33W–8L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mike Mooney
12W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tim Root
16W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.