Teams

TCC - Smith Tri-level 4.5

2024 Tuscaloosa USTA Tri-Level Weeknight 18&over · Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Anna Kniphfer
published 4
3.95
Lynne Mohlenbrok
published
3.95
Dorie Edwards
published 4
3.65
Taylor Pearce
published
3.55
Susan Whitt
published
3.45
Wendy Buchheit
published
3.27
Lois Strachan
published
3.13
Kelly Verzino
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Kniphfer
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
Lynne Mohlenbrok
21W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
4
Dorie Edwards
8W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Alexandra Salekin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Taylor Pearce
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
Susan Whitt
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.55
Wendy Buchheit
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
3.45
Lois Strachan
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Kelly Verzino
22W–20L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.