Teams

WTC - Poston 18 & Over Tri-Level 4.0,3.5,3.0

2026 Dothan USTA Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesCarol Hundley / Jenny Nelson vs Margaret Poston / Payton Ball6-3, 3-3
W#2 DoublesFaith Harmon / Katie Lewis vs Ashley Barron / Caroline Dozier6-3, 6-0
2026-06-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesFaith Harmon / Bay Chapman vs Katherine Martin / Caroline Dozier3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMargaret Poston / Jennifer Gonzalez vs Helen Mendheim / Elizabeth Hewitt7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFaith Harmon / Lily Mendoza vs Shea Turner / Katherine Martin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Edwards / Jenny Nelson vs Amanda Roberson / Kylie Harris6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Jessica Givens
published
3.42
Faith Harmon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Callie Ventress
published 3.5
3.06
Margaret Poston
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Allison Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Jenny Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Edwards + Jenny Nelson2354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Givens
8W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Faith Harmon
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Callie Ventress
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Margaret Poston
19W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Allison Edwards
14W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
Jenny Nelson
16W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.