Teams

TCR: Hollands

Twilight · Women Division III

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-03vs TCR: Kunze/BlythLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesToni Kiddie / Ruth ORegan vs Kate Gibbons / Carolyn Nutting2-6, 0-6
L#2 Female DoublesKimberly Ackles / Aylin Tunay vs Julie Blowers / Cheryl Gossin3-6, 2-6
2026-07-27vs Midvale: BentleyLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesElena Hollands / Julie Gambill vs Hayley Reed / Jane Mulvehill5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 Female DoublesKimberly Ackles / Ruth ORegan vs Maria Fornuto / Regina Michener4-6, 2-6
W#3 Female DoublesAmy Voellinger-Wagner / Deborah Flynt vs Erin Enright / Amanda Galley6-1, 6-1
2026-07-20vs CCR 2Won 21
W#1 Female DoublesJulie Gambill / Elena Hollands vs Georgia Franklin / Julie Haggerty6-1, 6-1
W#2 Female DoublesAmy Voellinger-Wagner / Cassandra Knight vs Anne Shea / Kaitlin Hildebrandt6-2, 6-0
L#3 Female DoublesToni Kiddie / Leslie Algase vs Pam Lowe / Abbey Greendyke2-6, 3-6
2026-07-13vs Midtown: BlueWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesJulie Gambill / Elena Hollands vs Laura Mullin / Meghan Murdock6-0, 6-1
W#2 Female DoublesAmy Voellinger-Wagner / Cassandra Knight vs Lyndsey Macmillan / Christine Horan6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 Female DoublesToni Kiddie / Leslie Algase vs Kristin West / Gabriela Saavedra1-6, 2-6
2026-06-15Won 30
W#1 Female DoublesElena Hollands / Julie Gambill vs Ginger Ruff / Martha McKenna6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesAmy Voellinger-Wagner / Cassandra Knight vs Katey Bourne / Ashlee Ellis6-3, 6-2
W#3 Female DoublesRuth ORegan / Toni Kiddie vs Amanda Casey / Shaina Depaul6-2, 6-4
2026-06-08vs TCR: Kunze/BlythSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesJulie Gambill / Amy Voellinger-Wagner vs Kate Gibbons / Betsy Wilson6-1, 6-0
L#3 Female DoublesToni Kiddie / Leslie Algase vs Taura Blyth / Cheryl Gossin0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Division III have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Julie Gambill
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Aylin Tunay
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Amy Voellinger-Wagner
usually #2 Female Doubles 60%, also #1 Female Doubles 20% · published
Deborah Flynt
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published
Elena Hollands
published
Kimberly Ackles
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published
Ruth ORegan
published
Toni Kiddie
usually #3 Female Doubles 80%, also #1 Female Doubles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Gambill
6W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Aylin Tunay
0W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
24%75%<1%
2.60
Amy Voellinger-Wagner
12W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Deborah Flynt
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Elena Hollands
7W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kimberly Ackles
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ruth ORegan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Toni Kiddie
1W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.