Teams

Cooper/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-26vs Bell/MemphisLost 04
L#1 SinglesGregory Stine vs Bradyn Bowman4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKevin Roedel / Noah Blank vs Christopher Gray / Cory Heinkel3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesROBERT LEBLANC vs Neal Patel2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Trout / Jay Knight vs BALAJI KRISHNAIAH / Jeffery Suber3-6, 3-6
2025-10-19vs Gladstone/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesBin Li / Xuezhong Li vs Michael Bradshaw / John Russell2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesROBERT LEBLANC vs Taylor Long1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRob Wenzler / Zack Cowell vs Ben Gladstone / John Sheahan6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDavid Kam vs Taylor Lackie6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Tyler Darby
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.89
Ian Strelsin
published
3.88
Xuezhong Li
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
David Kam
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Gregory Stine
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.53
ROBERT LEBLANC
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.49
Zack Cowell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Bret Sokoloff
published 3.5
3.38
Kevin Roedel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Jay Knight
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joe Trout
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rob Wenzler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bret Sokoloff + Kevin Roedel4167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Darby
20W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
4.04
Ian Strelsin
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Xuezhong Li
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
David Kam
17W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Gregory Stine
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.75
ROBERT LEBLANC
23W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Zack Cowell
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Bret Sokoloff
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
3.44
Kevin Roedel
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Jay Knight
19W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Joe Trout
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rob Wenzler
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.