Teams

Pevo/Arakelian CCL-DAY

2022 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2022-05-07vs Hawkins SJ(Day)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAdair Wright / Kathleen Timberlake vs Edith Fulcher / Kathleen Kunze6-0, 6-2
2022-05-02vs FURR/DURHAM PVCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Adair Wright vs Sandra King / Sarah McKenzie7-5, 6-0
2022-04-30vs Haskinsll 55s HTRCWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Angie Coats / Lynn Buehler6-0, 7-5
2022-04-27vs Matsche SJ (DAY)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Adair Wright vs Peggy O'Connell / Karen Fania2-6, 4-6
2022-04-21vs Tatum Women 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdair Wright / Kathleen Timberlake vs Linda Haller / Kathleen Glancy7-5, 6-1
2022-04-06vs CAMPBELLWon 10
W#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Adair Wright vs Sue Griffin / Barbara Costa3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-30vs Hawkins SJ(Day)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdair Wright / Kathleen Timberlake vs Birgitta Jonsson-Seal / Margaret Varga-Roberson6-1, 6-0
2022-03-26vs FURR/DURHAM PVCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Lisa Elsberry vs Lori Brinkley / Pamela Furr6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-03-25vs CAMPBELLLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Lisa Elsberry vs Barbara Costa / Sue Griffin1-6, 4-6
2022-03-23vs Haskinsll 55s HTRCWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Adair Wright vs Betsy Kahn / Sarah van Rens7-6, 6-1
2022-03-19vs Tatum Women 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Adair Wright vs Kim Byrd / Tess Casals6-4, 6-1
2022-03-07vs Matsche SJ (DAY)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Terry McCool vs Kathleen Bradcovich / Catherine Infante0-6, 4-6
2022-02-28vs McCall/Morton HTRCWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Elsberry / Kathleen Timberlake vs Lara Hanks / Barbara Pennington6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Lisa Elsberry
published
3.91
Kathleen Timberlake
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.77
Diana Rode
published 4
3.67
Barbara Caropolo
published 4
3.41
Patricia Thomson
published
3.35
Adair Wright
published 4
3.23
Terry McCool
published
Lisa Arakelian
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Elsberry
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%18%82%
4.12
4
Kathleen Timberlake
158W–61L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Diana Rode
19W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Barbara Caropolo
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Patricia Thomson
12W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
4
Adair Wright
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.35
Terry McCool
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Lisa Arakelian
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.