Teams

Brevard/Barto/Combo50&Over6.5W

2025 Brevard Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.21 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-08vs EFSC - UrbanWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoanna Garcia / Janis Mena vs Gisela Alcalde / Caroline Jiborn6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEdie Newell / Anne Barto vs Miriam Melendez / Bev Wilcocks6-3, 6-1
2025-10-01vs EFSC - UrbanWon 30
W#1 DoublesEdie Newell / Tracey Drake vs Sandy Dahl / Bonita Madden6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBecky Press / Elizabeth Shannon vs Miriam Melendez / Caroline Jiborn6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJoanna Garcia / Julia Tulloch vs Karen Lee / Bev Wilcocks6-0, 6-1
2025-09-30vs EFSC - UrbanWon 30
W#1 DoublesEdie Newell / Elizabeth Shannon vs Gisela Alcalde / Bonita Madden6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoanna Garcia / Julia Tulloch vs Karen Lee / Karyn Honaker6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSandra Edwards / Janis Mena vs Cynthia Simmons / Naisa Gilroy6-4, 6-4
2025-09-29vs EFSC - UrbanLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Winterich / Debbie Maropis vs Cynthia Simmons / Bev Wilcocks6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBecky Press / Megan Holthaus vs Sandy Dahl / Bonita Madden6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnne Barto / Julia Tulloch vs Gisela Alcalde / Karyn Honaker2-6, 5-7
2025-09-24vs EFSC - UrbanWon 30
W#1 DoublesBecky Press / Megan Holthaus vs Sandy Dahl / Bonita Madden3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Winterich / Tracey Drake vs Caroline Jiborn / Miriam Melendez6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJanis Mena / Anne Barto vs Karen Lee / Bev Wilcocks6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-03vs EFSC - UrbanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracey Drake / Michelle Winterich vs Sandy Dahl / Bonita Madden1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSandra Edwards / Janis Mena vs Gisela Alcalde / Faith Urban6-2, 6-0
2025-08-27vs EFSC - UrbanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMegan Holthaus / Joanna Garcia vs Bev Wilcocks / Sandy Dahl7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Maropis / Edie Newell vs Caroline Jiborn / Miriam Melendez6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Michelle Winterich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Edie Newell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Elizabeth Shannon
published
3.30
Becky Press
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Joanna Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.09
Sandra Edwards
published
3.04
Janis Mena
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.04
Tracey Drake
published
2.95
Julia Tulloch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Megan Holthaus
published
Anne Barto
published 3
Debbie Maropis
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Garcia + Julia Tulloch404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Winterich + Becky Press224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michelle Winterich
90W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
3.5
Edie Newell
160W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Elizabeth Shannon
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Becky Press
44W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Joanna Garcia
24W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Sandra Edwards
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Janis Mena
72W–58L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Tracey Drake
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Julia Tulloch
97W–101L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Megan Holthaus
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Anne Barto
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Debbie Maropis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.