Teams

LATA18/Williams/LCTC

2026 Combo 18 & Over-STA · Adult Women - 5.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 8 played
Sep 13 3:00 PM
Lexington County Tennis Complex
Sep 14 6:30 PM
Lexington County Tennis Complex
Sep 21 6:30 PM
The Creek at Mungo Park
Sep 28 6:30 PM
Lexington County Tennis Complex
2026-08-31vs LATA18/Nunnery/SSPLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Hatcher / Beverly Gould vs Fran Eleazer / Donna Money6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTina Houser / Chelsea Johnson vs Angela Mikolajczak / Emily Harmon1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElla Stilwell / Kathy Kearse vs Kelley Parr / Nonie Morris5-7, 1-6
2026-08-30vs LATA18/SMITH/LCTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer LeSuer / Beverly Gould vs Janis Caccamise / Kellie Corbett0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Barnes / Linda Barrett vs Tracie Ifkovits / Christine Bowman3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChelsea Johnson / Sarah Simms vs Marketa Kubickova / Laurie Phipps0-6, 0-6
2026-08-24vs LATA18/Sojourner/CAMPLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeverly Gould / Ella Stilwell vs Jennifer Espinosa / Kelly Holliday0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChelsea Johnson / Samantha Yager vs Marybeth Meyers / Elise Bui1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Barrett / Tina Houser vs Madelyn Norford / Reagan Durham3-6, 2-6
2026-08-17vs LATA18/SMITH/LCTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Kearse / Jennifer LeSuer vs Christine Bowman / Kellie Corbett4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Barrett / Tina Houser vs Le FRYE / Laurie Phipps6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Simms / Patricia Williams vs Tara Rogers / Cindy Smith4-6, 2-6
2026-08-10vs LATA18/Nunnery/SSPLost 12
W#1 DoublesBarbara Barnes / Sarah Hatcher vs Jeanie Farmer / Donna Money6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBeverly Gould / Samantha Yager vs Tami Richardson / Shay Brown2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKathy Kearse / Jennifer LeSuer vs Terri Stokes / Kelley Parr4-6, 1-6
2026-08-03vs LATA18/Sojourner/CAMPLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Hatcher / Ella Stilwell vs Barbara Belquist / Kelly Holliday3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Barrett / Jennifer LeSuer vs Kristen Sojourner / Madelyn Norford1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Williams / Barbara Barnes vs Jennifer Espinosa / Emma Miller2-6, 4-6
2026-07-28vs LATA18/SMITH/LCTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeverly Gould / Samantha Yager vs Christine Bowman / Sarah Mayle0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Williams / Jennifer LeSuer vs Le FRYE / Tracie Ifkovits0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Barrett / Tina Houser vs Lisa Bailey / Cindy Smith3-6, 1-6
2026-07-20vs LATA18/Nunnery/SSPLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Hatcher / Beverly Gould vs Fran Eleazer / Emily Harmon0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElla Stilwell / Linda Barrett vs Angela Mikolajczak / Donna Money1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTina Houser / Kathy Kearse vs Terri Stokes / Rebecca Keilty2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Barbara Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Sarah Hatcher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Beverly Gould
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.32
Kathy Kearse
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.31
Sarah Simms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Jennifer LeSuer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.24
Ella Stilwell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.13
Tina Houser
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.08
Samantha Yager
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.89
Linda Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Hatcher + Kathy Kearse3842% games−1.5% vs expected
Sarah Hatcher + Samantha Yager404 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer LeSuer + Linda Barrett033 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer LeSuer + Kathy Kearse123 matchesnot enough data
Linda Barrett + Tina Houser123 matchesnot enough data
Beverly Gould + Samantha Yager033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Barbara Barnes
5W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Sarah Hatcher
9W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%18%82%
2.63
3
Beverly Gould
23W–45L career · 6 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Kathy Kearse
7W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Sarah Simms
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
Jennifer LeSuer
9W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Ella Stilwell
10W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Tina Houser
8W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Samantha Yager
23W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Linda Barrett
3W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Patricia Williams
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.