Teams

KY/LOU/MENTING/BAGLEY

2024 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Marcia Littlefield
published
3.39
Michelle Menting
published
3.38
Abbey Heird
published 3.5
3.36
Joanne Lynch
published
3.23
Kim Greenrose
published
3.21
Kara Cook
published
3.15
Kristi Whistle
published
3.12
Jennifer Rassiga
published
3.11
Mary Culver
published
3.10
Allyson Bagley
published 3.5
2.80
Margy Stivers
published
Irina McGrath
published
Julie Mcdonnell
published
Krista Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Menting + Allyson Bagley2351% games−2.7% vs expected
Joanne Lynch + Jennifer Rassiga224 matchesnot enough data
Allyson Bagley + Julie Mcdonnell134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marcia Littlefield
16W–35L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
Michelle Menting
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Abbey Heird
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Joanne Lynch
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.36
Kim Greenrose
20W–20L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Kara Cook
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Kristi Whistle
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.15
Jennifer Rassiga
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
Mary Culver
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Allyson Bagley
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Margy Stivers
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.80
Irina McGrath
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Mcdonnell
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Krista Johnson
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.