Teams

RRC 40-Lovers

2023 55&over Mixed · 6.0

18 players · average NTRP 2.96 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesELOY CARACUEL / Barbara Cabassa vs Alfred Rotondaro / Jodi Venuti6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Kentros / Michael Masino vs Nancy Hanover / Carl Thorsberg6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Nask / Paul Wolfson vs Karen Casper / Swamy Sunkara6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesSusan Nask / Brian Keane vs Nancy Hanover / Alfred Rotondaro6-7, 5-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Keane / John Chow vs Maureen Varcasio / Richard Segal2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Dan Moriarty vs Diana Daneshvar / Laurence Eng2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesELOY CARACUEL / Barbara Cabassa vs Nancy Hanover / Carl Thorsberg6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesArthur Kentros / Carolyn Lao vs Laurence Eng / Evamarie Khandji0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDolores Principe Masino / Michael Masino vs Richard Segal / Jodi Venuti2-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesMary Kentros / Paul Wolfson vs Evamarie Khandji / Alfred Rotondaro2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDolores Principe Masino / Michael Myllek vs Diana Daneshvar / Laurence Eng4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Lao / JOAQUIN COTTANI vs Karen Casper / Richard Segal2-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Dan Moriarty vs Lee Seham / Maureen Varcasio3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDolores Principe Masino / Michael Myllek vs Kathy Thorsberg / Laurence Eng0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Lao / JOAQUIN COTTANI vs Karen Casper / Swamy Sunkara0-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesMary Kentros / Brian Keane vs Kathy Thorsberg / Lee Seham7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDolores Principe Masino / John Chow vs Jodi Venuti / Alfred Rotondaro6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrea Mancini / Arthur Kentros vs Carl Thorsberg - * / Nancy Hanover3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Southern: Club Fit Briarcliff: Golden Aces0612512128
2RRC 40-Lovers0651225169

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
ELOY CARACUEL
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Andrea Mancini
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.86
Karen Keane
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Michael Myllek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Susan Nask
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Michael Schultz
published
2.82
Paul Wolfson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Brian Keane
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
JOAQUIN COTTANI
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Michael Masino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Arthur Kentros
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Diane Cashman
published 3
2.50
Mary Kentros
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.27
Dolores Principe Masino
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Dan Moriarty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.25
Carolyn Lao
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Barbara Cabassa
published
John Chow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Kentros + Michael Masino2644% games+3.2% vs expected
Dolores Principe Masino + Michael Masino151151% games−6.7% vs expected
Andrea Mancini + Brian Keane2447% games−9.8% vs expected
Carolyn Lao + Paul Wolfson21140% games−10.4% vs expected
Andrea Mancini + Michael Masino0636% games−14.3% vs expected
Dolores Principe Masino + Michael Myllek4440% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Mancini + Dan Moriarty3540% gamesnot enough data
Karen Keane + Brian Keane4349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
ELOY CARACUEL
26W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Andrea Mancini
155W–124L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.09
Karen Keane
44W–46L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
Michael Myllek
50W–49L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Susan Nask
92W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
Michael Schultz
23W–44L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Paul Wolfson
54W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Brian Keane
54W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.79
3
JOAQUIN COTTANI
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Michael Masino
70W–92L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Arthur Kentros
12W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Diane Cashman
59W–55L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Mary Kentros
64W–68L career · 3 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Dolores Principe Masino
146W–140L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Dan Moriarty
6W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Carolyn Lao
58W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.25
Barbara Cabassa
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Chow
22W–32L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.