Teams

LJFrye/NMP

2022 Lake USTA 40 & Over League · Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-08vs LCOR-ORR/WESTPORTWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristy Wiseman / Deborah Young vs Cindy Orr / Ann Murphy6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-25vs LMAdinolfi/FarmsWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristy Wiseman / Tia Allocco vs Maria Palios / Erika Schapiro6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesClaudia Burdulis / Heidi Poulton vs Amy Limbert / Theresa Kochalka6-0, 6-2
2022-03-18vs LACooper/Trump 40+ 3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Young / Victoria Ciucci vs Alix Bonnamour / Allison Nelin1-6, 1-6
2022-03-11vs LCLong/PeninsulaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristy Wiseman / Judy Frye vs Susan King / Christine Tattersfield3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesHeidi Poulton vs Lisa Carlyle1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Newman / Terri Merklein vs Danielle Mikolajczyk / Stacey Haglund6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-04vs LSPE-Perro/EDGEMOORSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristy Wiseman / Deborah Young vs Brenda Kadlecik / Stacy VanWassenhove6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTia Allocco / Heidi Poulton vs Denise Takes / Dawn Andiloro6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Kristy Wiseman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Heidi Poulton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Alison Pangilinan
published 3.5
3.07
Katie Scruggs
published
2.90
Judy Frye
published
2.88
Tia Allocco
published
2.88
Victoria Ciucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Terri Merklein
published
2.79
Susan Newman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Claudia Burdulis
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristy Wiseman + Victoria Ciucci4457% gamesnot enough data
Judy Frye + Katie Scruggs123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristy Wiseman
81W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Heidi Poulton
99W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Alison Pangilinan
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Katie Scruggs
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Judy Frye
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
Tia Allocco
8W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Victoria Ciucci
58W–83L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
Terri Merklein
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Susan Newman
38W–60L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Claudia Burdulis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.