Teams

Huckelbury/FS/HO

2025 Fall Into Doubles · 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.80 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-09vs Newby/VB/VBTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Holmes / Naomi Conley vs Kim Newby / Laura King5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBillie Nelligan / Lisa Huckelbury vs Sara Cunningham / Lora Smith2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesConni Ulmschneider / Dawn Stovall vs Melissa Hanna / Teresa Brooks0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-11-25vs Newby/VB/VBTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Daniel / Payton Goins vs Lora Smith / Audrey Ostrander6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJill Holmes / Naomi Conley vs Kim Newby / Christine Turpin6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Parker / Sara Adair vs Sara Cunningham / Teresa Brooks0-6, 0-6
2025-11-17vs Newby/VB/VBTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesNaomi Conley / Billie Nelligan vs Audrey Ostrander / Lora Smith0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesConni Ulmschneider / Payton Goins vs Melissa Hanna / Laura King4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Holmes / Cindy Koenigseder vs Kim Newby / Kara Cunningham1-6, 5-7
2025-11-03vs Newby/VB/VBTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCindy Koenigseder / Barbara Daniel vs Sara Cunningham / Audrey Ostrander0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Huckelbury / Shanita Christian vs Teresa Killough / Laura King6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDawn Stovall / Lisa Parker vs Teresa Brooks / Kara Cunningham4-6, 0-6
2025-10-20vs Newby/VB/VBTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPayton Goins / Sara Adair vs Kim Newby / Kara Cunningham2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBarbara Daniel / Dawn Stovall vs Sara Cunningham / Teresa Brooks1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNaomi Conley / Shanita Christian vs Christine Turpin / Lora Smith4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Newby/VB/VBTC50132892
2Huckelbury/FS/HO0521328161

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Barbara Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Jill Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.42
Shanita Christian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Naomi Conley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.24
Billie Nelligan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.21
Cindy Koenigseder
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Dawn Stovall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.19
Lisa Huckelbury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Sara Adair
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Conni Ulmschneider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Payton Goins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Koenigseder + Jill Holmes2351% games+3.7% vs expected
Cindy Koenigseder + Barbara Daniel4353% games−11.3% vs expected
Billie Nelligan + Naomi Conley1627% games−11.5% vs expected
Dawn Stovall + Conni Ulmschneider123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Daniel
15W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Jill Holmes
51W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Shanita Christian
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
Naomi Conley
7W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.36
4
Billie Nelligan
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.24
3.5
Cindy Koenigseder
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
4
Dawn Stovall
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.20
Lisa Huckelbury
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19
Sara Adair
24W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Conni Ulmschneider
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
Payton Goins
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.