Teams

Haggard - Mixed 55s 8.0

2022 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-07-12vs Majestic - Mixed 55s 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaryn Efird / Ron Mangrum vs Charles Bolton / Carrie Ganim3-6, 2-6
2022-05-31vs Lane - Mixed 55s 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRon Mangrum / Karyn Efird vs Yvonne Singh / Robin Andree5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Joy Martin
published
3.60
John W Quick
published
3.58
Karyn Efird
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Ron Mangrum
published
3.41
Chris Amos
published 4
3.39
3.29
Vicky Bethel
published
3.24
Marla Damas
published
2.95
Betty Haggard
published 3.5
Paul Nolan
published
Sherrie Kruse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John W Quick + Gwen Highsmith-Quick0831% games−10.6% vs expected
Ron Mangrum + Sherrie Kruse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joy Martin
56W–80L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
John W Quick
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
Karyn Efird
256W–113L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.58
Ron Mangrum
14W–35L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Chris Amos
5W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.41
3.5
Gwen Highsmith-Quick
4W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Vicky Bethel
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.29
Marla Damas
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Betty Haggard
5W–24L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
Paul Nolan
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherrie Kruse
32W–60L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.