Teams

Blossom Servivors

2022 65 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 6.0 Adult Women Flight

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult Women Flight have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Sandy Pena
published
2.93
Tressa Trayhan
published
2.59
Michelle McNatt
published
2.35
Dolores Arellano
published 2.5
Julie Fair
published
Mary Druck
published
Sheila Wilson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy Pena
19W–20L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Tressa Trayhan
21W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
Michelle McNatt
11W–42L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
2.5
Dolores Arellano
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
0%87%13%
2.35
Julie Fair
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Druck
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheila Wilson
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.