Teams

Fly/Memphis

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 2.5 Mixed 18 & Over

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-21vs Battle/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesBen Gilluly / Sydney Gilluly vs Carter Ricks / Casey Gleysteen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-18vs Silk/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison King / Joshua Shipley vs Laurin Murk / Marjorie Porter7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Deplautt / Laura Gilluly vs Nathan Evans / Francesca Bengert1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTanner Baker / Kevan Hatamzadeh vs Jennie Silk / Barry Cohen6-2, 6-4
2026-06-27vs Plummer/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Deplautt / Tanner Baker vs Chad Collett / Marnisha Boddie4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBen Gilluly / Laura Gilluly vs Andre Johnson / Rachel Spangler2-6, 1-6
2026-06-20vs Silk/MemphisWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Fly / Colleen Wilson vs Laurin Murk / Claire Murk6-3, 6-2
2026-06-17vs Battle/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesColleen Wilson / Joshua Shipley vs Casey Gleysteen / Elliott Dent6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAllison King / Stephen Fly vs Allie Olson Battle / Louis Connelly6-1, 6-2
2026-06-06vs Plummer/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesBen Gilluly / Laura Gilluly vs Kelli Cook / Will Washington6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoshua Shipley / Colleen Wilson vs Nadine Emil / Andre Johnson3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Fly / Tanner Baker vs Lyndsay Slusher / Jonathan Dyson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Fly/Memphis4211716152
2Plummer/Memphis4212617141
3Silk/Memphis339919141
4Battle/Memphis1541432203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.57
Ben Gilluly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.51
Joshua Shipley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Laura Gilluly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Stephen Fly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Tanner Baker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Ben Gilluly
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%31%69%
2.57
Joshua Shipley
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
Laura Gilluly
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Stephen Fly
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.36
Tanner Baker
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.