Teams

CTL18/Peterson/CTC

Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo Women - 6.5

25 players · average NTRP 3.55 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-08vs CTL18/wilkes/SEPWon 21
L#1 DoublesBeth McCorkle / Lauren Ragsdale vs Kate Flintom / Rachel Spence1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesHelen Grant / Carene Floyd vs Erika Houghtaling / Susan Dowd3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmanda Dye vs Melissa Hayden6-0, 6-0
2024-10-01vs CTL18/Donnelly/WRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesHelen Grant / Rossi Green vs LIZA GREGORY / Teresa Ziegler6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth King / Beth McCorkle vs Leigh Matthews / Angie Dyches6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Zais / Lauren Ragsdale vs Savanna Platt / Teresa Campbell5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-06-22vs CTL18/CLARK/CTCSplit 11
L#2 SinglesBeth McCorkle vs Jen Coody6-7
W#3 SinglesShannon Peterson vs Anne Mangubat6-0, 6-1
2024-06-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHelen Grant / Allen White vs Thiagu Chandrasekaran / Leigh Matthews1-6, 1-6
2024-06-15vs CTL18/CLARK/CTCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesHelen Grant vs Devin Koop6-4, 7-6
L#3 SinglesSusan Zais vs Jen Coody1-6, 4-6
2024-06-13vs CTL18/GREENWOOD/CTCLost 01
L#1 SinglesChris Dunbar vs Brett Stevens6-7, 5-7
2024-06-01Won 10
W#3 SinglesChristy Davis vs Devin Koop6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-05-29vs CTL18/Donnelly/WRCWon 10
W#2 DoublesBarrett Self / Christy Davis vs Savanna Platt / Adam Woodruff6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Amanda Dye
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.88
Janaki Emani
published
3.70
Shannon Peterson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.57
Lauren Ragsdale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Beth McCorkle
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.51
Joanna Dover
published
3.50
Christy Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.48
Erin Groves
published 3.5
3.37
Helen Grant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Jill Cutler
published
3.31
Rossi Green
published
3.27
Carene Floyd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Amelia Murphy
published 3.5
Ashley Kirkham
published 3.5
Chris Dunbar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Emily Clark
published 3.5
3.23
Jennifer Hanner
published
3.21
Shannon Martin
published
3.16
Juanita Cooney
published
3.16
Susan Zais
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Kerry Ford
published
3.04
Courtney Remley
published 3
Jessica Hallman
published
Kathryn Rice
published
Nancy Mailman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Dye + Lauren Ragsdale9082% games+17.0% vs expected
Juanita Cooney + Jill Cutler8071% games+15.9% vs expected
Ashley Kirkham + Shannon Peterson10178% games+15.6% vs expected
Rossi Green + Lauren Ragsdale13369% games+13.5% vs expected
Helen Grant + Janaki Emani5076% games+12.3% vs expected
Beth McCorkle + Jill Cutler11074% games+11.5% vs expected
Shannon Peterson + Janaki Emani12268% games+11.2% vs expected
Juanita Cooney + Kerry Ford7074% games+10.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Dye
58W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.92
Janaki Emani
56W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.88
Shannon Peterson
146W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Lauren Ragsdale
90W–20L career · 1 line in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Beth McCorkle
159W–71L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Joanna Dover
34W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
4
Christy Davis
45W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Erin Groves
74W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Helen Grant
88W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
Jill Cutler
84W–64L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
Rossi Green
84W–27L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Carene Floyd
36W–13L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Amelia Murphy
20W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Ashley Kirkham
47W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Chris Dunbar
40W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Emily Clark
48W–29L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Hanner
62W–41L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Shannon Martin
54W–66L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Juanita Cooney
91W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.16
Susan Zais
75W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Kerry Ford
134W–78L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Courtney Remley
42W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.04
Jessica Hallman
44W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathryn Rice
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Mailman
101W–37L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.