Teams

DC Tennis Club

2023 Washington D.C. Mixed 40 & Over · Washington D.C. Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-09vs Nancy / KevinWon 21
W#1 DoublesMitchell Miller / Amy Hunter vs Tamara Clarke / Anthony Rickert7-6
W#2 DoublesWhitney Paxson / Eric Paisner vs Gifford Wong / Andrea Foster6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Ratner / Heidi Hill vs James Shevlin / Nancy Perkins0-6, 1-6
2023-07-08vs Havin FunWon 21
W#1 DoublesWhitney Paxson / Mitchell Miller vs Rhonda Palmer / John Palmer6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Hunter / Jeffrey Marks vs David Bartholomew / M Miles6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCharles Davant / Elizabeth Pollitt Paisner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-17vs Havin FunWon 30
W#1 DoublesWhitney Paxson / Jeffrey Marks vs Mary Ring / Jon Felts6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCharles Davant / Amy Hunter vs Laree Martin / Alex Bittner6-3, 6-7
W#3 DoublesNadia Asancheyev / Eric Paisner vs Mikaela Seligman / Phillip Belin2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-06-11vs Nancy / KevinWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeffrey Marks / Cara Camacho vs Rick Ball / Jillian Kingwood6-4, 5-5
W#2 DoublesMitchell Miller / Heidi Hill vs Tamara Clarke / Peter Tice6-4, 4-1
2023-06-04vs Havin FunWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric Paisner / Elizabeth Pollitt Paisner vs Mikaela Seligman / Brian Lynch2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNadia Asancheyev / Mitchell Miller vs Sharon Sabasteanski / Mardi Muru6-2, 4-2
L#3 DoublesCharles Davant / Heidi Hill vs Alex Bittner / Mary Ring4-6, 5-5
2023-06-04vs Nancy / KevinWon 20
W#1 DoublesWhitney Paxson / Jeffrey Marks vs Fedra Witting / James Shevlin6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCharles Davant / Amy Hunter vs Clinton Parks / Tamara Clarke6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-03vs Nancy / KevinWon 21
W#1 DoublesWhitney Paxson / Eric Paisner vs Tamara Clarke / Peter Tice6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCara Camacho / Charles Davant vs Nancy Perkins / Clinton Parks6-3, 4-5
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Pollitt Paisner / Tom Conroy vs Jillian Kingwood / Rick Ball1-6, 1-6
2023-05-20vs Havin FunWon 21
W#1 DoublesWhitney Paxson / Mitchell Miller vs Rhonda Palmer / John Palmer6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEric Paisner / Amy Hunter vs Sharon Sabasteanski / Lew Taylor6-2, 4-4
L#3 DoublesNadia Asancheyev / Charles Davant vs Alex Bittner / Mary Ring3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Washington D.C. Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Whitney Paxson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.40
Eric Paisner
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Mitchell Miller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.23
Charles Davant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Jeffrey Marks
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Cara Camacho
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Nadia Asancheyev
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Amy Hunter
published 3
2.75
Elizabeth Pollitt Paisner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jeffrey Ratner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Paxson + Jeffrey Marks16465% games+12.2% vs expected
Whitney Paxson + Mitchell Miller7075% games+8.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Pollitt Paisner + Eric Paisner17858% games+7.4% vs expected
Charles Davant + Elizabeth Pollitt Paisner7261% gamesnot enough data
Whitney Paxson + Eric Paisner6167% gamesnot enough data
Nadia Asancheyev + Charles Davant3256% gamesnot enough data
Cara Camacho + Jeffrey Marks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Paxson
57W–11L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Eric Paisner
79W–33L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
Mitchell Miller
72W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.25
3.5
Charles Davant
47W–47L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Jeffrey Marks
37W–35L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Cara Camacho
47W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
Nadia Asancheyev
29W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Amy Hunter
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Elizabeth Pollitt Paisner
32W–41L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
Jeffrey Ratner
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.