Teams

MLong-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

15 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-11vs MWein-ENOLost 23
W#1 DoublesMark Rhoades / Matthew Davies vs Matthew Wein / Venkat Ravi6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesStuart Beeson vs Winston Davis6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAlex Kroeger / Robert Long vs Curtis Schulze / Victor Labarthe6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBill Schaller vs Drew Templeton3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBala Guduru / Daud Tareen vs Jeff Pobst / Josh Fernandez0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Stuart Beeson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.88
Robert Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Matthew Davies
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
2.78
Mary T Long
published
Alex Kroeger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Brent Fox
published 3
2.70
Mark Rhoades
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Charles McMillan
published 2.5
2.44
Bill Schaller
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.38
Bala Guduru
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Cole del Charco
published 2.5
2.10
Daud Tareen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher LeGrand + Mark Rhoades224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stuart Beeson
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.23
Robert Long
13W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Matthew Davies
12W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Christopher LeGrand
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alex Kroeger
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Brent Fox
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Rhoades
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Charles McMillan
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%29%71%
2.58
3
Bill Schaller
1W–9L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Mohammad Alimohammadi
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Bala Guduru
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cole del Charco
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Daud Tareen
2W–9L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Jeffrey Scott Taylor
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.