Teams

Team 2 Jones

2024 NOVA Singles · NOVA Singles 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.57 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-20vs Team 4 No Man's LandWon 20
W#1 SinglesKendra McQuillan vs Emily Satterthwaite6-2, 2-1
W#2 SinglesSibyll Jones vs Noeline Arul6-3, 4-0
2024-10-13vs Team 7 Net Jobs 3.5Won 10
W#2 SinglesClaudia Guardia vs Lynnita Montague-Daddio6-3, 6-2
2024-10-07vs Team 5 This is 40-loveSplit 11
W#1 SinglesStacy Huisman vs Sophie Lockerby6-3, 6-0
L#3 SinglesSibyll Jones vs Elisa Wolf6-4, 1-3
2024-09-28vs Team 3 MulanBloom Single 3.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKendra McQuillan vs Menglun Qin6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesStacy Huisman vs Tana Jankowiak6-3, 3-5
L#3 SinglesSibyll Jones vs XIAOZHEN LIN7-6, 0-2
2024-09-21vs Team 9 Liu-JuanWon 10
W#3 SinglesYulan Jin vs Xuan Du6-1, 3-2
2024-09-14vs Team 6 Rally CatsLost 01
L#3 SinglesYulan Jin vs Susan Velasco6-7
2024-09-06vs Team 1 Wasabi PeasLost 01
L#1 SinglesClaudia Guardia vs KATERYNA SAVCHYN4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Cecelia Campbell
published 4
3.47
Kendra McQuillan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Stacy Huisman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Yulan Jin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Sibyll Jones
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Claudia Guardia
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Indre Conners
published
2.78
Angela Boone
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Huisman + Sibyll Jones9161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecelia Campbell
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
3.5
Kendra McQuillan
165W–89L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Stacy Huisman
61W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Yulan Jin
236W–177L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Sibyll Jones
149W–177L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Claudia Guardia
65W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Indre Conners
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
3.5
Angela Boone
4W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.