Teams

SoCal/Wlcek/65&Over9.0M

2025 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - CV · CV Men 9.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-18vs CV-Silver Sands/Ray JacobyWon 30
W#1 DoublesGlenn Petrovic / Hector Mendoza vs Dwayne Begay / Neil Jacoby6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Larson / Matt Houseman vs Ray Jacoby / Donald Rintoul6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCraig Thomas / Kevin Kearney vs Kim Jow / Dwayne Mann6-1, 6-1
2025-02-11vs CV-Silver Sands/Ray JacobyWon 30
W#1 DoublesGlenn Petrovic / Hector Mendoza vs Donald Rintoul / Dwayne Begay6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Thomas / Kevin Kearney vs Ray Jacoby / Neil Jacoby6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarty Briesach / David Larson vs Kim Jow / Dwayne Mann6-3, 6-2
2025-02-11vs CV-Silver Sands/Ray JacobyWon 30
W#1 DoublesGlenn Petrovic / Hector Mendoza vs Ray Jacoby / Neil Jacoby6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCraig Thomas / Kevin Kearney vs Donald Rintoul / Dwayne Mann6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarty Briesach / David Larson vs Kim Jow / Dwayne Begay6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Glenn Petrovic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.44
Ross Hessler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.36
Craig Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.34
John Wlcek
published
4.10
Brian Denny
published 4
3.79
Tony Martin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Kevin Kearney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Marty Briesach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Houseman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Thomas + Ross Hessler7076% gamesnot enough data
Matt Houseman + Tony Martin404 matchesnot enough data
Craig Thomas + Kevin Kearney314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Glenn Petrovic
7W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.55
4.5
Ross Hessler
37W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Craig Thomas
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
4.36
John Wlcek
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.34
4
Brian Denny
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
4.10
4
Tony Martin
53W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.79
Kevin Kearney
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marty Briesach
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matt Houseman
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.