Teams

LoVV 3.0

2024 Prince Georges Singles · Prince Georges Singles 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-09vs RacqueteersLost 01
L#3 SinglesSHAMEKA JENNINGS vs Emily Schabacker5-7, 3-6
2024-11-02Won 10
W#2 SinglesFrancesca Dougherty vs Sheryl Young6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-26vs RacqueteersLost 01
L#1 SinglesSHAMEKA JENNINGS vs Kayla Lesesne1-6, 0-6
2024-10-20vs Serving YouWon 20
W#1 SinglesAklil Getachew vs Jasmine Beasley7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesANEESAH WILLIAMS vs Leslie Fields7-5, 6-2
2024-10-12vs Serving YouLost 02
L#1 SinglesSHAMEKA JENNINGS vs Naomi Hall2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesANEESAH WILLIAMS vs Denese Cavanaugh0-6, 2-6
2024-10-06vs RacqueteersLost 01
L#2 SinglesFrancesca Dougherty vs Sailata Katragadda2-6, 3-6
2024-09-29vs Serving YouWon 10
W#1 SinglesAklil Getachew vs Naomi Hall6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-27vs RacqueteersWon 20
W#1 SinglesAklil Getachew vs Andrea Torres6-2, 6-0
W#3 SinglesANEESAH WILLIAMS vs Eveline Shum7-6, 6-1
2024-09-20vs Serving YouWon 10
W#1 SinglesSHAMEKA JENNINGS vs Jasmine Beasley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-15vs RacqueteersWon 10
W#3 SinglesFrancesca Dougherty vs Eveline Shum6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Aklil Getachew
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Kelly Kennedy
published
2.98
Tosha Clark
published
2.86
ANEESAH WILLIAMS
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
SHAMEKA JENNINGS
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.75
Francesca Dougherty
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.63
Tammie Wiley
published 3
Roxie Landry
published
Valerie Carpenter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammie Wiley + ANEESAH WILLIAMS6354% gamesnot enough data
ANEESAH WILLIAMS + SHAMEKA JENNINGS314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aklil Getachew
115W–108L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Kelly Kennedy
71W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.03
Tosha Clark
54W–37L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
ANEESAH WILLIAMS
55W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
SHAMEKA JENNINGS
85W–59L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Francesca Dougherty
57W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Tammie Wiley
81W–67L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Roxie Landry
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Valerie Carpenter
5W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.